Extensive (CDB) Hydrogel Filament Growth In C19 Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Blood Cultures After One Week of Incubation - A Comparison by Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD In Conjunction With Clifford Carnicom

Image 1: Magnification 160x. Unvaccinated Blood

In this article, we continue to share the observation of incidental findings in blood cultures of three C19 vaccinated and one unvaccinated blood sample. These were the same samples that we did electrical conductivity studies on. I described the results of those tests in this article:

Unvaccinated vs Vaccinated Blood Comparison - Infrared Spectroscopy and Electrical Conductivity Studies - Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD In Conjunction with Clifford Carnicom

As some background information, we also reported on detailed blood culture results of unvaccinated blood and microscopic findings here:

Blood Cultures of Unvaccinated Blood Shows Extensive (CDB) Filament Development After 2 Weeks Incubation- Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD In Conjunction With Clifford Carnicom

The four new samples discussed in this article were highly diluted blood at a ratio of 100:1 with water and left to incubate at room temperature for one week. No electrical current or external energy source was applied. None of the individuals have symptoms of Morgellons/ CDB Disease.

As we can see in Image 1 above, regardless of unvaccinated status, we have extensive CDB filaments that have developed after one week of blood culture. Even with highly diluted samples, the filament growth is impressive.

Image 2. Magnification 640x. C19 Vaccinated Blood Subject 1. CDB’s seen, photographed in motion, hence the tube like appearance

Image 3. Magnification 160x. C19 Vaccinated Blood Subject 1. CDB and filament growth seen

Image 4. Magnification 160x. C19 Vaccinated Blood Subject 2. CDB and filament growth seen

Image 5. Magnification 640x C19 Vaccinated Blood Subject 2. CDB and filament growth seen. CDB’s are source of filament genesis

Image 6. Magnification 640x C19 Vaccinated Blood Subject 3. CDB and filament growth seen.

Below are comparison images, all from Engineer Shimon Yanowitz in Israel.

All three images are Pfizer BioNtech C19 samples in Neubauer Chamber incubated at room temperature just like the blood samples above. After 20-30 minutes filament structures started to form. Note the similar alignment that the CDB filaments show in above blood culture images.

Summary:

The blood culture work between C19 vaccinated and unvaccinated blood did not show any difference in filament growth. All samples had evidence of CDB in them. There is a similarity in the linear development of filaments in the blood samples and the incubated C19 Pfizer BioNtech. This poses the following questions in my mind:

Have the vaccine ingredients self spread via a mechanism called shedding?

Are the observed CDB and subsequent filaments from environmental sources like spraying via geoengineering?

Has the platform of the C19 injectables worsened the phenomena of blood contamination that was already present via geoengineering?

Given the increased mortality in C19 vaccinated and the incidence of rubbery hydrogel clots found in the vaccinated deceased, are the unvaccinated in similar danger as I have been concerned due to documentation of blood contamination and increased blood clot incidence of those who have these structures in their blood? Clearly the unvaccinated already have had ill health effects which we call long Covid. Will this ultimately lead to not just increased morbidity but also mortality?

Are the CDB’s actually in the shots, given the recent findings of Kevin McKernan PhD sequencing bacterial DNA from the vials? COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain excessive quantities of bacterial DNA: evidence and implications

Clifford also has found that the CDB’s have DNA in them but has not had the means to do a sequencing analysis. I wonder if we would find a match given the culture results in human blood. This would answer the question if the filament growth is coming from environmental sources or the C19 shots.

Clearly we see evidence of synthetic artificial intelligence biology. Is this evidence of a possible human extinction level event due to the unrestricted release of nanotechnology in form of synthetic biology?

This list of questions is not final. Clifford and I agree that we are witnessing what I posed in the last question. We are sounding the alarm for all of humanity to become aware of this threat, and demand a stop to the C19 injectables and the entire transhumanist agenda, including biological geoengineering.

I personally am convinced that the blood of humanity shows evidence of a crime of unprecedented proportions.

If you would like to support our research Project “ What happened to Humanities Blood? “, please donate to Carnicom Institute. We are a team of scientists dedicated to saving the human species and our planet. Thank you.