27 Comments
User's avatar
Theara's avatar

ce sont des micro bulles de GRAPHENE comme on peut le constater dans des videos industrielles sur le Graphene, que INFO VACUNAS a montre et demontre il ya plus de 3 Ans

apparues sur le net dans l'interview du Dr Sandre Botha sur Stew peters show ,ou elle les a decouvertes dans les fioles ,mais ne sait pas ce que c'est

https://odysee.com/@WakeUpMirror:3/I-GM:f

je ne vois pas le rapport avec des ' micro robots' !!

vos bulles dans les videos ne sont pas du tout les memes

les micro bullles de graphene on cette typique structure avec un anneau NOIR

c'est deja suffisament grave que ces micro bullles (qui peuvent contenir des charges utiles ) soient injectees dans le corps des gens !

Video complete de Info Vacunas

Expand full comment
Natural Purity's avatar

Hmm, looks a little bit similar to the bubbles in this “ropeworm” microscopy: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=da5232ea2b21146de6e982fb9ec5296a9c4bdf17

Of course this is not a worm, more of a bio-polymer as Clifford Carnicom described

Expand full comment
Robert Sun's avatar

SEPTEMBER 16 2024. VIDEO TAKEN ON SLOAT BLVD IN SAN FRANCISCO.

AS I DRIVE ON SLOAT BLVD SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENS TO THE LIGHTS ON STREET!

I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS!

MIDWAY ON THE VIDEO IT APPEARS ON TOP OF SCREEN WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE A DRONE TO ME!

NOISE IS MY Z APP!!

https://x.com/RobertoSun6/status/1846767935471472646?s=19

Expand full comment
Desert Nomad's avatar

Oh good grief! I don't have the time and patience to give you the technical education to understand this stuff, but I'll try to simplify it for you.

You have shown bubbles moving around in a fluid (blood). This is not equivalent to nanobots. Nowhere close. Bubbles can be made to move, or they might move on their own. They may attach to something and then move. They may cause things to clump. That's it! No structure, no functionality. In one article, it said lasers can cause microbubbles to move in one direction. If you use a laser to guide the bubble to move in a particular direction, in order for there to be any complexity of movement, it requires the laser (an EXTERNAL device) AND some kind of programming directing the laser to change so that it directs complex movement.

When is the last time you saw a laser being aimed at a shot victim? Without the laser, no meaningful movement. None.

What you are essentially saying is that a brick is the house, the gas tank is the car. Suppose I use the fuel in my gas tank to propel my car and move it, I drive into a parking lot full of cars and park there. Now I have a self-assembly of cars, don't I? This is about what you appear to be saying. And what does a self-assembly of cars in a parking lot OD? Nothing!

A microbubble is a COMPONENT. A microrobot is a DEVICE MADE OF COMPONENTS. Many, many components. It probably has some hardware that can cause it to move or grasp something, and some software that tells it how to do this. The microbubble is only a small part of that.

Another article you linked claims graphene in the shots. Maybe, even likely. BUT, the STRUCTURES you have shown in some photos are QUADRILATERALS, which graphene forms HEXAGONAL crystals. Graphene is NOT INVOLVED in the crystals in your photos.

The shots might contain particles that fluoresce, or lanthanides and other toxic substances. None of that is nanobots.

Quantum dots are tiny particles made of a semiconductor. A possible component. NOT A NANOBOT. Not a device. A component is not a device.

Now another thing. You talk about nanopores. A nanopore is just a tube. It is NOT A SENSOR. Think of looking through a tube, or a telescope. Your EYE is the sensor, not the telescope. Don't confuse the two.

A clump of something is NOT A MICROCHIP. The requirements for manufacturing a microchip are EXTREMELY COMPLEX. Just forcing stuff to clump together isn't going to cut it. Sorry.

"Tiny robots that can transport individual neurons and connect them to form active neural circuits could help us study brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease."

Neurons aren't in the blood stream. There isn't another fluid in the body where stuff can be moved freely about.

Read this article:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/12/08/1084696/medical-microrobots-are-still-on-their-way/

This technology is NOT HERE YET. The shots were deployed in early 2021. This article was written in 2023. STILL NOT HERE YET.

It talks about a microrobot about the size of a pencil tip. You aren't going to be injecting pencil-tip sized objects through a hypodermic needle. Nor will they assemble from stuff in that injected fluid into ANY USEFUL DEVICE.

Even if I grant that such devices presently exist, NONE OF THE IMAGE YOU HAVE SHOWN DEMONSTRATE THEY ARE IN THE BLOOD OF SHOT VICTIMS.

"Microbubbles seen all over the world in COVID19 vials, live blood, urine, mediations, supplements ARE microrobots that can self assemble microchips for biosensing and other application."

This is TOTAL AND UTTER NONSENSE. Yes, you have shown microbubbles. And that's ALL you have shown. Nothing more.

People are indiscriminately using "microbots" to label bubbles that do nothing more than move and maybe drag something with them. Science is supposed to be precise. It seems evident that people who write these technical papers are looking for sensationalism to make a name for themselves, and the current climate of massive fraud in technical papers provides the perfect medium.

Please stop spreading these myths. You are making all of us look foolish, which is EXACTLY what the enemy wants. We have plenty of REAL STUFF to talk about. Let's leave the fairy tales alone.

Expand full comment
Bee Gee's avatar

Cognitive Dissonance is a cruel master.

Its in your blood too so why dont you get your own microscope and show us how wrong she is?

Expand full comment
Desert Nomad's avatar

What's in my blood? Cognitive dissonance? Or nanobots? I never took the shots. Nothing inappropriate in my blood.

I don't need to get my own microscope. The photos she is showing clearly demonstrate that her CONCLUSIONS are WRONG. I rely on HER photos.

Expand full comment
J Galbory's avatar

Update From Reiner Fuellmich 15 October 2024

They are trying to break him, but he has fantastic resilience

https://youtu.be/XRud7lswIyE?si=WNCQ26j5mxrL2tsA

Expand full comment
Clot Shot Lab's avatar

Hey Ana, I think you should try to get your work published on new decentralized science platforms such as researchhub.com

we need as many people getting their work seen as possible. I’m also trying to tell Clifford Carnicom, but looks like he hasn’t logged in for a long time and had a post recently about his communications being shut down.

Expand full comment
Jeremy Darrell Wilson's avatar

Someone should call Me I’ll donate my body to science. I am in A lot of pain in my body is completely disfigured. Buy these things inside of me. I’ve seen many doctors and Nun can explain what is happening but I can since I was surgically implanted by these monsters in the middle of the night almost 5 years ago. The things inside of me has grown exponentially. My email address is Jeremy Wilson 4@msn.com.

Expand full comment
Bee Gee's avatar

I think you should buy a $24 bottle of Arizona oral EDTA, a $9 bottle of pure Vitamin C as ascorbic acid crystals and then Take Them.

Im not a doctor or giving you medical advice but if it were Me and I felt that bad, I would stop eating altogether, drink a ton of water and Take 3 arizona EDTA pills and a quarter teaspoon of C crystals dissolved into water every 8 hours.

Then keep it up for 3 or more days and I think you will feel Much better, although you might have to keep taking it for a while, it cant fix it overnight.

There are other things you can take that Help but C and EDTA works Best.... and fasting is the most effective way to take Oral EDTA so thats what l do.

Good luck to you in any case.

Expand full comment
Jeremy Darrell Wilson's avatar

My phone number is 8282928059

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 16
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Pasheen Stonebrooke's avatar

would love to see a vid on this - lcq and Adams...if you have it...thx, kaal

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
kaal's avatar

sorry 2 judge.

Expand full comment
Pasheen Stonebrooke's avatar

ha...we all do it. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Bee Gee's avatar

It irritated me at first too, but if you can sit through it all, he makes some valid points that I think they should take heed of.

Sure, its minor amounts below toxic thresholds, sure elements arent chemicals, sure there is a bunch of sodium in the jabs...

but they also report values that are below the LOD spec of their machine and make basic procedural errors, like adding microliters of test substance to milliliters of diluted water and nitric acid.

They should fix their basic errors and get their machine validated and certified to a known standard if they want their work to withstand academic scrutiny...

Although I also think he should try to reproduce their work and see what values he finds but still, they need to be Correct about their work.

Expand full comment
Robert M. Davidson MD PhD's avatar

Ana- call me skeptical about microbubbles. They've been known and studied for over a decade. Your post is the first time I've seen a human attribute assigned to such bubbles, i.e. an un-Godly, transhumanistic attribute given to a phenomenon that might be explained on the basis of natural phenomena, as opposed to man made. I need persuasion.

Expand full comment
Bee Gee's avatar

She has made many many posts about this for over 2 years now, so why would you read one article and then say you need more evidence?

This happens all the time, I read this One Thing, now prove your previous 2 or 3 years of research that I havent read.... in a Comment!

Read More, and watch some of her video presentations and Then ask questions.

Also she doesnt answer people here in the comments anymore, she is too busy but some people here may be able to help you, after you help yourself.

https://rumble.com/c/HumanityUnitedNow/videos

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Bee Gee's avatar

Good work, keep it up and I think you will feel much better, like we do.

But EDTA is Not nearly all destroyed by stomach acid, thats what that study from 1952 Theorized but they were Wrong.

Take one of your pills and empty it into a glass of orange juice or Any acidic liquid. Or add some HCLA water to the powder from one of the pills and watch what happens.

Nothing.

EDTA is SOOOOO extremely hydrophobic that it will not dissolve whatsoever into any acidic liquid. Period.

It requires pH of 8 or 9 for EDTA to dissolve into water, which is far far from your stomach pH.

I dont have it handy but go back and read the actual study all the other EDTA studies Reference and you will see the Multiple flaws in their methodology.

Here is another source of Oral EDTA that talks about it but they dont have any good study links, just text.

https://www.cardiorenew.com/faq4.php

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 16
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

EDTA is not a mineral and works and safe so why not

Expand full comment
Leon's avatar

Hi, Hypersanity Infinitus;

Thank you for the comment. Can you elaborate on 'Jamming Technology' you use? Thanks.

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

To every health problem, there is a solution in Nature (however, it may take longer depending on damage done and for how long it was done). Which EMP/jamming tech do you suggest?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 19
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

Harmful radiation is nature too. Thanks for not answering my question.

Expand full comment