Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

One of the best things we can do is NOT wear sunglasses like Jeff (but thanks Jeff for the interview) as our eyes use UV to detoxify and fight disease:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/4-ways-sunglasses-harm-our-health-07f

am's avatar

Great presentation, and I like that Anna does not tolerate "transcendence" (denial) as a strategy for dealing with this tech. Practical solutions are essential, to respect the precious gift of one's body. I take about 1200mg EDTA with 1000mg Ascorbic Acid crystals in the middle of the night when I get up to pee. It is very detoxifying and makes my dreams vivid.

Ana mentions that PEMF helps the nanotech. However, the test she published on this in 2023 (https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/pulsed-electro-magnetic-field-and?utm_source=publication-search) doesn't prove this. There is no detail on the type of PEMF, frequency, intensity, proximity, nor any further tests using different combinations of these. Since these factors can harm or help a body, it stands to reason that they can also harm or help nanotech. I would be very surprised if nanotech thrived on all versions of PEMF. I invite further exploration of this topic by Ana or anyone else.

There are some very astute comments further down on this old thread, about different types of PEMF and their effects on nanotech. I found this commenter's work helpful: https://substack.com/@solutions4mankind

Dr. Peter Glidden, ND, suggested that getting an MRI without contrast can disrupt the nanotech.

I do believe that TZLA plasma and certain scalar devices also can be effective treatments.

67 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?