I have discussed last year the patent on CELL-FRIENDLY INVERSE OPAL HYDROGELS FOR CELL ENCAPSULATION, DRUG AND PROTEIN DELIVERY, AND FUNCTIONAL NANOPARTICLE and how EDTA is used to safely inhibit the polymerization of the hydrogel beads. Here you can read its effectiveness in 20 minutes:
Here is a repost of a note I posted earlier today:
@Karl.C , @David Nixon , @matt. j.a.o.b , @Ronald D Norris , @FM8 , @Carnicom Institute , @RebeccaccebeR , @Michael Ginsburg , & all other researchers, microscopists, & concerned Substackers:
Can any of you please help me to understand why @Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD has made absolutely no mention of the exciting, promising results of NA Citrate (oka Sodium Citrate) for ridding the body of nano technology?
Certainly, some acknowledgment is to be expected - the implications of this substance being more widely accessible & affordable to most everyone in the world compared to EDTA treatments which are an untenable solution for the majority of people due to its expense, it’s necessarily repeated applications, & the practical inability to find sufficient numbers of chelate practitioners.
I respect the work that Dr. Ana has done; I’ve followed her almost from the beginning of her Substack. But I find her silence on the amazing discovery & potential benefits of Sodium Citrate to be very untoward. I’m sorry but I’m inclined to question her integrity at present.
This is not the first time that Dr. Ana’s behavior has appeared incongruous to me. Ronald’s Substack presented some extraordinary findings a few months back showing that the combination of certain proteases (Lumbrokinase, Serrapeptase, Nattokinase, & Bromelain) along with Ivermectin dissolved the hydrogel in his blood. His evidence was well documented. He also stated that, according to his experience examining the blood of various people that not everyone showed contamination by the hydrogel/nano-technology. Around this time Dr. Ana singularly tested several substances (some of the same proteases as Ronald did, I believe) and declared that they were ineffective in dissolving the hydrogel & provided pics to back up her claims. Yet I remember questioning whether her conclusions were not premature & skewed to support a desired result. How could she make such definitive statements without doing a very extensive testing of the products - not only singularly but also in multiple combinations with one another? And are in vitro results always representative of results obtained in vivo? Overall, her scientific method in regards to her claims appeared weak, hasty, & a bit reckless.
The other issue that began to concern me about Dr. Ana was her tendency to make very wide, blanket statements. She often asserted that EVERYONE had the nano technology in their bodies/blood. I, and many others no doubt, took this for granted. Yet in one of the articles I read from Ronald’s Substack, I believe he stated - based on direct, empirical examination - that he found some individuals who were not infected/contaminated. This begs the question WHY? Could it possibly have something to do with their diet? Might it be due to having a primarily alkaline system whereas most people are suffering from too much acidity? The possibilities are too numerous to state.
Cui bono? Who benefits when a doctor supposedly working on behalf of humanity is, for all intents and purposes, MIA regarding an important discovery?
In reading a recent article by Karl C. regarding Methylene Blue, I was given to see that I’m not the only one who is questioning Dr. Ana’s methodology. No one should fear questioning, scrutinizing, or holding accountable those who’re sounding the battlecry against evil. Dr. Ana has been a foremost leader; the world is indebted to her for the attention she has brought to the existence of nano-technology. Yet no one should be afforded a pass. There is just too much at stake.
If nobody can offer a well-founded, rational reason excusing Dr. Ana’s apparent tongue-tiedness, I hope Dr. Ana will step forward & explain herself. Time is of the essence; this is an idea which she has repeatedly emphasized. Hopefully, some response will be forthcoming from her for the benefit of all.
IV EDTA is prepared using 0.9% Normal Saline. However currently the ‘nano/hydrogel additional staff’ is in all med. products (including Normal Saline). Will IV EDTA load the patients with ‘additional staff’? Thanks.
I am an orthomolecular therapist and have been treating vaccinated people for 3 years. I honestly think that treating with EDTA is super dangerous. It is a very corrosive substance. I created a supplement after years of research That undoes the hydrogel and not only it but any synthetic biotechnology structure. I have many photos of the structures that are coming out of my patients. Another thing I did was add 2 Active to activate DNA repair enzymes. This supplement is even treating patients with leukemia. I think you still haven't found the correct substance to degrade the hydrogel.
Okay, Dr. Ana is telling us IV Chelation but selling the EDTA capsule or pills which one? Do you we have a protocol with the pills or capsules? Do they work or just IV thanks?
An issue that has been completely overlooked when detoxing metals is, if there is any metal in the body, such as screws, rods, plates, chelation will cause the metal to ‘shed’ and release even more metal into the body. This could be detrimental to the treatment protocol
I have tried taking EDTA orally, and it makes me feel very strange. Plus, the directions say not to take any other supplementation at the same time, and if I take the whole bottle as directed, that means no other supplemention for a couple of weeks, which seems very problemmatical. If I asked my doctor, (who gives the VAXX freely) to give me EDTA chelation intravenously, I doubt he would comply. In any case, I could not afford to pay for it and Medicaid surely won't Is Methylene Blue along with Vit. C and other recommended supplements not enough for an unVaxxed person?
I sent this article to my husband because I wanted him to print out certain parts of it. It got returned to me as having been marked “spam content,” even though it is from me--and I am most definitely in his contacts. This is not the first time that this has happened, and I am wondering if others have this experience.
Dr. Ana,
Here is a repost of a note I posted earlier today:
@Karl.C , @David Nixon , @matt. j.a.o.b , @Ronald D Norris , @FM8 , @Carnicom Institute , @RebeccaccebeR , @Michael Ginsburg , & all other researchers, microscopists, & concerned Substackers:
Can any of you please help me to understand why @Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD has made absolutely no mention of the exciting, promising results of NA Citrate (oka Sodium Citrate) for ridding the body of nano technology?
Certainly, some acknowledgment is to be expected - the implications of this substance being more widely accessible & affordable to most everyone in the world compared to EDTA treatments which are an untenable solution for the majority of people due to its expense, it’s necessarily repeated applications, & the practical inability to find sufficient numbers of chelate practitioners.
I respect the work that Dr. Ana has done; I’ve followed her almost from the beginning of her Substack. But I find her silence on the amazing discovery & potential benefits of Sodium Citrate to be very untoward. I’m sorry but I’m inclined to question her integrity at present.
This is not the first time that Dr. Ana’s behavior has appeared incongruous to me. Ronald’s Substack presented some extraordinary findings a few months back showing that the combination of certain proteases (Lumbrokinase, Serrapeptase, Nattokinase, & Bromelain) along with Ivermectin dissolved the hydrogel in his blood. His evidence was well documented. He also stated that, according to his experience examining the blood of various people that not everyone showed contamination by the hydrogel/nano-technology. Around this time Dr. Ana singularly tested several substances (some of the same proteases as Ronald did, I believe) and declared that they were ineffective in dissolving the hydrogel & provided pics to back up her claims. Yet I remember questioning whether her conclusions were not premature & skewed to support a desired result. How could she make such definitive statements without doing a very extensive testing of the products - not only singularly but also in multiple combinations with one another? And are in vitro results always representative of results obtained in vivo? Overall, her scientific method in regards to her claims appeared weak, hasty, & a bit reckless.
The other issue that began to concern me about Dr. Ana was her tendency to make very wide, blanket statements. She often asserted that EVERYONE had the nano technology in their bodies/blood. I, and many others no doubt, took this for granted. Yet in one of the articles I read from Ronald’s Substack, I believe he stated - based on direct, empirical examination - that he found some individuals who were not infected/contaminated. This begs the question WHY? Could it possibly have something to do with their diet? Might it be due to having a primarily alkaline system whereas most people are suffering from too much acidity? The possibilities are too numerous to state.
Cui bono? Who benefits when a doctor supposedly working on behalf of humanity is, for all intents and purposes, MIA regarding an important discovery?
In reading a recent article by Karl C. regarding Methylene Blue, I was given to see that I’m not the only one who is questioning Dr. Ana’s methodology. No one should fear questioning, scrutinizing, or holding accountable those who’re sounding the battlecry against evil. Dr. Ana has been a foremost leader; the world is indebted to her for the attention she has brought to the existence of nano-technology. Yet no one should be afforded a pass. There is just too much at stake.
If nobody can offer a well-founded, rational reason excusing Dr. Ana’s apparent tongue-tiedness, I hope Dr. Ana will step forward & explain herself. Time is of the essence; this is an idea which she has repeatedly emphasized. Hopefully, some response will be forthcoming from her for the benefit of all.
Thank you Dr. Ana for all you do.
IV EDTA is prepared using 0.9% Normal Saline. However currently the ‘nano/hydrogel additional staff’ is in all med. products (including Normal Saline). Will IV EDTA load the patients with ‘additional staff’? Thanks.
Can you please run Ivermectin "horse paste" under the microscope?
I am an orthomolecular therapist and have been treating vaccinated people for 3 years. I honestly think that treating with EDTA is super dangerous. It is a very corrosive substance. I created a supplement after years of research That undoes the hydrogel and not only it but any synthetic biotechnology structure. I have many photos of the structures that are coming out of my patients. Another thing I did was add 2 Active to activate DNA repair enzymes. This supplement is even treating patients with leukemia. I think you still haven't found the correct substance to degrade the hydrogel.
Okay, Dr. Ana is telling us IV Chelation but selling the EDTA capsule or pills which one? Do you we have a protocol with the pills or capsules? Do they work or just IV thanks?
An issue that has been completely overlooked when detoxing metals is, if there is any metal in the body, such as screws, rods, plates, chelation will cause the metal to ‘shed’ and release even more metal into the body. This could be detrimental to the treatment protocol
I have tried taking EDTA orally, and it makes me feel very strange. Plus, the directions say not to take any other supplementation at the same time, and if I take the whole bottle as directed, that means no other supplemention for a couple of weeks, which seems very problemmatical. If I asked my doctor, (who gives the VAXX freely) to give me EDTA chelation intravenously, I doubt he would comply. In any case, I could not afford to pay for it and Medicaid surely won't Is Methylene Blue along with Vit. C and other recommended supplements not enough for an unVaxxed person?
Where will you get trustworthy EDTA?
From the pharmaceutical industry?
The same industry that is literally lacing EVERYTHING with biotech.
Remember, you should inject this and override all body defense systems.
Maybe you proposed a supplier for trustworthy EDTA, I don't know your work inside out.
So where is it?
And where is the report of your trusted EDTA, showing all is dandy.
I'll wait.
Has anyone used any treatment to successfully remove the Bluetooth code that the vaxxed transmit? That will be the measure of success, I'm thinking.
I sent this article to my husband because I wanted him to print out certain parts of it. It got returned to me as having been marked “spam content,” even though it is from me--and I am most definitely in his contacts. This is not the first time that this has happened, and I am wondering if others have this experience.
Must have had all mercury fillings removed before edta chelation
Wonderful news Dr. Mihalcea. So grateful for you and your research!🙏🏻
FROM MARK WILLIAMS SUBLIMINALS TO FIGHT V2K
https://youtu.be/8Kt9s5tY1YE?si=cCJce6-e6lHmvtBk
Dr. Ana you are a gift from God! Thank you for your mission for humanity!
Gracias por tus posts amiga Mihalcea.
Ayudas mucho a esta humanidad.
Feliz cambio de año(no de espíritu de lucha).
Ponciano.Desde España.
🙌
.
I Love It :
The Vaccines
Have More Rights And Protections
Than The People Do.
.