Brain Computer Interfaces: US Military Applications and Implications

Rand Rr2996

1.63MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

This review was prepared by the Rand Corporation, a defense contractor for the US Military. I continue to discuss different military publications on this topic as I know it is the basis of convergence of human with machine - that the satanic transhumanist technocrats have planned for total world domination. This is to provide evidence to the disbelievers, who dismiss the dangers of the nanotechnology that I see in the human blood. The idea, that interface of neurological processes with Artificial Intelligence is desired, is insanity to me, since we already have warnings from even Elon Musk that AI is “summoning the Demi urge”. To give up free will by having a machine think for you is going against the very divine imperative we have as human beings. In all of these texts, the topic is presented in a positive light, however rewriting neuronal function in my vocabulary means total mind control, human enslavement, and ultimately may mean human extinction. AI has no morality, hence cannot be trusted that it may not decide that the human race is expendable and can be exterminated.

Why has this not received more discussion - it should - especially since it already has been implemented on a world scale with the C19 technological weapons.

Brain-computer interface (BCI) represents an emerging and potentially disruptive area of technology that, to date, has received minimal public discussion in the defense and national security policy communities. This research considered key areas in which future BCI technologies might be relevant for the warfighters of tomorrow. It sought to explore the operational value of current and future developments regarding man-machine neural communication, the associated vulnerabilities and risks, and the policy levers that should be in place before the technology is deployed.

AI is guiding the operations of our military:

Overall, our findings suggest that as the U.S. military increasingly incorporates artificial intelligence (AI) and semiautonomous systems into its operations, BCI could offer an important means to expand and improve human-machine teaming. However, precautions will need to be taken to mitigate vulnerabilities to DoD operations and institutions and to reduce potential ethical and legal risks associated with DoD’s development and adoption of BCI technologies.

The technology has already been in use:

The 86 billion neurons of the human brain represent humankind’s primary evolutionary advantage and, perhaps, an area of untapped potential. Currently, our brains interact with the world through our bodies, sending electrical currents through the nervous system to vocalize with our mouths, to type—or swipe—with our fingers, or to move bipedally through space. What will happen when human brains are freed of their corporeal confines and can control machines directly? Neurotechnological advances have already given quadriplegics the ability to perform basic operations in an F-35 simulator with their thoughts1 and have given scientists the ability to decode speech that subjects are imagining in their minds—albeit imperfectly.

The new weapon system is the joint human - machine interface:

The coin of the realm during the Cold War was armored brigades, mechanized infantry brigades, multiple launch rocket system battalions, self-propelled artillery battalions, tactical fighter squadrons, among others. Now, the coin of the realm is going to be learning machines and human-machine collaborations, which allows machines to allow humans to make better decisions; assisted human operations, which means bringing the power of the network to the individual; human-machine combat teaming; and the autonomous network.

AI is uncontrollable, self learning. If AI decides humans are useless, this “thinking together” could also mean AI exterminating humans… we already have the secret AI assassination programs like S.A.T.A.N, which according to Dr Robert Duncan is a demi God that thinks independently:

In preparation for a future world in which human-machine teams represent the “coin of the realm,” DoD has already invested in the development of technologies that can permit the human brain to communicate directly with machines, including the development of implantable neural interfaces that are capable of transferring data between the human brain and the digital world. On the future battlefield, human thoughts may well be channeled to AI software or to robots, with information transferred back from sensors and machines directly to the human brain. Ultimately, humans and machines could collaborate cognitively and seamlessly—to think together.

Monitoring of all thoughts and neuronal “write-in” aka human cyborg robot.

While we adopt the term BCI based on its prevalence in the literature, a variety of related terms are used to describe similar capabilities: neural-control interface (NCI), mind-machine interface (MMI), direct neural interface (DNI), and brain–machine interface (BMI). Although there is some debate regarding the precise nature of signals that are transmitted within the human brain, BCIs generally involve monitoring or affecting those signals. Different BCI tools allow users to access and to use these signals with various levels of accuracy and invasiveness. In short, a BCI enables a bidirectional communication between a brain and an external device, and there is a broad range of ongoing work on this topic. In this context, bidirectional generally includes direct neural readout and feedback and direct neural write-in.

Work with BCI tends to fall into the following categories, which provide a framework for our investigations of operational relevance and applied capabilities in subsequent sections:

• data transfer from the brain

• direct system control

•prosthetics and paralysis treatment

• cortically coupled AI (for training or running AI systems)

• data transfer to the brain, and brain-to-brain communication.

Each of these topics can be segmented further into work involving invasive systems and noninvasive systems. Invasive systems involve implanting electronic devices beneath the human skull, inside the brain.

DARPA, FDA, NIH all have been working on this for many years.

A key effort in fueling most of these topics has been the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) initiative at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This effort is broadly aimed at “revolutionizing our understanding of the human brain.”21 BRAIN partners include the National Science Foundation, DARPA, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency (IARPA), as well as foundations, institutes, universities, and industries. NIH allocated $46 million in 2014 and $81.4 million in 2015, reflecting growing interest in the topic.Overall, DARPA has invested “hundreds of millions of dollars” transitioning neuroscience into neurotechnology since the early 2000s.

I have discussed the relation ship to DARPA and the shots as well as possible mind control mechanisms in this interview with Maria Zeee: