Here is the must watch presentation: Dr. John Coleman: Committee of 300, Club of Rome & Royal Institute of Int. Affairs People often ask who is behind the Satanic Transhumanist New World Order and what do the Elites do to protect themselves from all the bioweapons they are using to depopulate the earth.
And for those who don't believe you, Dr. Mihalcea, all one has to do is go on the Club of Rome's website, peruse it a little bit and look at their publications. Honestly, just reading their home page gives me the shivers. And makes me want to vomit in fear. I would love an investigative journalist to identify every member and see where they are placed in world governments. https://www.clubofrome.org/
This is an excellent presentation by Dr. Coleman. You might want to see my review of his book Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 on my free blog Not-the-NWO Book Reviews (tieresias.substack.com). I have a PhD in English literature so this is something I can do to contribute. I review books on the strategy, not tactics, of the cabal, focusing on the identities and organisation of the actors at the top. So for example I have not reviewed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.s magnificent The Real Anthony Fauci, which should have won him a Nobel prize.
Thanks for this, I read the Committee of 300 a little while back and thought... Hmmmm interesting... Definitely saw the wind back of industry over the years in the west, and though of Dr Coleman's book... Then the slow social debauchery and division of last ten to five years... But... Then in 2020, all this started, and OMG, full on... "It's happening" I thought to myself, I'd always considered this a far off thing, but they made their play, and many people fell for it.... The pain of knowledge to be trapped in this nightmare where most people have ZERO idea that they are being taken over is freaking me out... No matter how much I try some people are still trapped in the dream that everything is normal .. If more people were aware, they'd wake up quick... Thanks so much for this, so great to hear him speak these words... I must highly recommend the "Committee of 300" or his other book "One World Government"... Right now, very important books...
Take this great John Coleman video posted by Dr Ana, and this montage of the inhuman academic of the WEF, Yuval Noah Harari and you can see what's going on... If Yuval was on the news, people would be f*€#ing terrified...
By the late 1800s, large cities all around the world were “drowning in horse manure”. In order for these cities to function, they were dependent on thousands of horses for the transport of both people and goods. In 1900, there were over 11,000 hansom cabs on the streets of London alone. There were also several thousand horse-drawn buses, each needing 12 horses per day, making a staggering total of over 50,000 horses transporting people around the city each day. To add to this, there were yet more horse-drawn carts and drays delivering goods around what was then the largest city in the world.
This huge number of horses created major problems. The main concern was the large amount of manure left behind on the streets. On average a horse will produce between 15 and 35 pounds of manure per day...Each horse also produced around 2 pints of urine per day and to make things worse, the average life expectancy for a working horse was only around 3 years. Horse carcasses therefore also had to be removed from the streets. The bodies were often left to putrefy so the corpses could be more easily sawn into pieces for removal.
****This problem came to a head when in 1894, The Times newspaper predicted… “In 50 years, every street in London will be buried under nine feet of manure.”***
It never happened. Why? The same reason Paul Ehrlicht, former catastrophic global cooler who became a catastrophic global warmer, just like Obama's absurd climate czar John Holdren (I have quotes from them claiming 50 years ago it was certain the next ice age was at hand, calling for - wait for it! - deindustrialization - and that reason is: *****MINDS MATTER MORE THAN MOUTHS.***** In theology, this is called prevenient grace, or common grace given to all mankind.
And yes, you are indeed correct: The WEF, Schwab, Soros, Gates, etc are too utterly STUPID to figure this out. Oh yes, they are connected; they get by on cronyism; and some are indeed idiot savants - brilliant in one area, but retarded in all others, and worse, many are utterly amoral.
But then, NONE of them take Emanuel's advice, like Soros, ~ 95 yrs old, Kissinger ~ 100, the Clintons, now at least mid 70s, Biden ~ 80 etc. etc etc. But I don't blame them, as there is an actual, literal Hell, and shells of people do in fact go there (a good fictional example of this would be in CS Lewis' book The Great Divorce).
THEY are definitely retarding science and medicine!
I have a new take on lung physiology that dismisses the idea that gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide, are dissolved in our blood and are exchanged in the lungs.
My Substack article is titled: We breathe air not oxygen
I discuss the difference between air and oxygen and the cause of oxygen toxicity.
I discuss the role of salt - water must follow salt not lead in the equation of hydration
If we are to dismantle the multiple layers of medical retardation, this new way of viewing lung physiology must be explored robustly.
Underpinning my research is Peter Peterson’s free eBook available at smashwords
100 reasons water is not H2O
The corruption of how we are schooled to view water as a chemical equation is the MAJOR disruptor in science and medicine.
May curiosity be your friend
Jane333
Search: Smashwords – 100 Reasons Water Is Not H2O – a book by Peter Peterson
As Blaise Pascal once noted, once science is divorced from ethics, scientists will use their skills to pursue power, not truth. The late Dr. Michael Chricton wrote, similarly years later, “as Alston Chase put it, ‘when the search for truth is confused with political advocacy, the pursuit of knowledge is reduced to the quest for power.’” Or see the 2023 article by computer professor at Univ. of Washington, Militant Liberals Are Politicizing Artificial Intelligence
What is behind the global warming? The same thing that was behind the global cooling scare of the 1970s: The 1974 Club of Rome report titled, Mankind at the Turning Point stated, “The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” Their solution was simple – engineer a massive reduction in population and utterly change the socio-economic system through centralized planning via total government control. And yes, this does smack of being called “The Final Solution” to me, too. This “man is the enemy” was reiterated by the Club of Rome in 1993, as well, when they stated in their The First Global Revolution, downloadable at http://www.scribd.com/doc/2297152/Alexander-King-Bertrand-Schneider-The-First-Global-Revolution-Club-of-Rome-1993-Edition that “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” A full Club of Rome history can be found here, from the Club itself.
But what is weird is that despite the geometric growth in world population over the past century, there has also been geometric growth in the average standard of living for the world’s people. The “founder” of the belief, espoused in the Declaration of Independence, that each human has “inalienable rights” to life, liberty, and “the pursuit of happiness” is quoted as saying, “I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.”
So-called negative eugenicists even took things further, with some, like famed playwright George Bernard Shaw, calling for people to be called before a state-appointed board to justify their existence or be put to death.” The human response to this? Burgess Meredith put it simply in this 8 minute Twilight Zone episode, where Rod Serling notes in the world of what is today the WEF, “logic is an enemy and truth is a menace.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOYYCkVazBI
PJ Media put it this way in 2022 in The Great Reset: A Perfect Storm “As Dennis Meadows claims in a recent interview with the leftist online magazine Resilience, “I don’t know what a sustainable population level is now, but it’s probably much closer to a billion people, or fewer.” The authors are skeptical of growth as a function of what they call “overshoot,” of “go[ing] beyond limits accidentally,” which can ultimately produce an “ecological footprint” that is unsustainable. They do not recognize that growth and its negative offshoots can be managed without employing drastic solutions — solutions that are themselves a product of overshoot. “If a profound correction is not made soon,” they warn, “a crash of some sort is certain.” The trouble is, they are the crash.”
Today’s power elites are now saying, “You may not have an abundant life. Or as Maurice Strong, chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference – who promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to “save the environment” said, about his radical ecologist agenda: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General Secretary, Strong declared “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable. (emphasis added). Rockefeller Foundation official Alan Gregg, another outspoken globalist, recently declared that the world has cancer and that cancer is mankind – excluding himself, of course.
“We came up with the idea??” the Club of Rome asked? In other words, a conclusion had already been reached, and now they needed to create a “reason” to support their unsupported – and as Julian Simon provisionally demonstrated, possibly false - a priori assumptions. Do not try this technique in any school paper you may attempt, or you will be failed!
Everything is based on the utterly, and provably, false assumption of Malthusianism.
It is all as the Anglican Reverend Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) wrote in hs first edition of the 1799 Essay on the Principle of Population:“We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.” And later, he added re. the lowborn: “I should propose a regulation to be made, declaring that no child born from any marriage taking place after the expiration of a year from the date of the law, and no illegitimate child born two years from the same date, should ever be entitled to parish assistance… The infant is, comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place.”
(In opposition to this were, e.g. Leibniz and economist Henry C Carey, 1793-1879. As Matt Ehret writes about Carey, who advised Lincoln during the Civil War, limits to population growth could be changed by encouraging progress! Hearkening back to the debate between Newton and Leibniz a century and a half earlier, Carey exposed the fallacy behind Mathus – and in the 1900s, the Ehrlichs, Holdrens, etc. – by writing in his Unity of Law: As Exhibited in the Relations of Physical, Social, Mental and Moral Science (1872):“Mr. Malthus was led to invent a law of population by means of which to relieve the rich and powerful from all responsibility for the existing state of things; giving them assurance that the poverty and wretchedness by which they were everywhere surrounded had resulted from the fact that the Creator had sent upon the earth large numbers of people for whom He had provided no table at which they might be allowed to eat, no materials by aid of which they might be clothed; thus furnishing the theory by aid of which subsequent writers have been enabled, as they supposed, to prove that, in the British Islands, man had become “a drug” and “population a nuisance.” Of course, The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 exposed that fallacy, as did the Simon/Ehrlich wager a century later, as well as their second following bet (which was rejected, but more nuanced). Simon’s worldview is simply summarized as “more people, more innovations, more value created, more abilities to deal with environmental problems.” Carey outlined a contrast with his two most influential works: Unity of Law and Harmony of Interests which is masterfully reviewed by Matt Ehret on his substack . Carey anticipated by 150 years the global warmers, citing that even back then to these types “man had become “a drug” and “population a nuisance.”
In contrast, the Carey, there is an interconnectedness of the powers of mind to the powers of nature: “The more his power of association, the greater is the tendency toward development of his various faculties; the greater becomes his control of the forces of nature, and the more perfect his own power for self-direction; mental force thus more and more obtaining control over that which is material, the labors of the present over the accumulations of the past…” Ehret summarizes this Malthus/Carey conflict thusly at https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/does-life-or-death-govern-the-universe-188?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=260045&post_id=84392812&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email : “Where Carey and his collaborators placed value on the power of human creative thought which gives the human species a unique power and duty to leap beyond the limits to growth in the process of acting as co-participants of universal creation, his enemies saw value in the worshipping of money and acquisition of property (which included other people). In order to counteract the optimistic spread of this science of political-economy as understood by Carey and his co-thinkers around the world during the latter half of the 19th century, much effort made to re-enforce the closed Newtonian system and its Malthusian corollaries to a new science that came to be dubbed “entropy.” Or think the war by the controllers today against the pro-growth, pro-freedom movement against, e.g., Klaus Schwab.
behind satan there is always yahweh/enlil monster flesh and blood being pulling the strings... look up mauro biglino who translated the earliest ancient hebrew bibles and how they match up with sumerian history....
Years ago I read of a Russian scientist in the 1930's who found he could create plague in the human body by using radiowaves to create a negative form of pleomorphism, the same type of phenomenon that Raymond Royal Rife had witnessed changing viruses into bacteria and the bacteria into mold, but this Russian guy actually found a way to make that specific disease state with the accompanying pathogen, and working for the communists at the time, of course, that would be his natural demonic terrorist genocidal objective. This is how 5G is probably being used in combination with the cocktails of ingredients now found in the so-called mRNA COVID 'vaccines', mRNA-containing foods from animals that have eaten GM fodder, and the newer generation of mRNA COVID 'vaccine'-containing vegetables etc.
The only reason I skimmed through this post was the last paragraph:
"The elites protect themselves with herbal compounds mixed with sugar and the protection of low frequency radiation. Using the technology developed by the virologist Gurtjev (?) who proved that every living thing has a vibratory cycle. He was able to measure the vibratory cycle of deadly viruses. By vibrating them double their cycle you would kill them instantly. That is one of the defensive weapons they got that will kill the plague if they ever get it. The same technique will kill cancer cells. The medical profession run by the Rockefellers and pharmaceutical companies did not want you to know this."
So the elites have been using advanced and effective medical treatments that they somehow keep secret from all their underlings who are not allowed to get the treatments. Only the secret treatments of the elites are effective. That's a really far out conspiracy theory and I bet it has zero evidence to support it.
So the elites conspire to spread bioweapons on the earth with the knowledge that only themselves are protected. How does it feel to know that your treatments for COVID are likely not as effective as what the elites have? Does that described treatment sound plausible to you?
Alternative medicine has been around longer than the Club of Rome, founded in 1968. So what the elites are using is some kind of alternative medicine that does not sound all that advanced to me.
And for those who don't believe you, Dr. Mihalcea, all one has to do is go on the Club of Rome's website, peruse it a little bit and look at their publications. Honestly, just reading their home page gives me the shivers. And makes me want to vomit in fear. I would love an investigative journalist to identify every member and see where they are placed in world governments. https://www.clubofrome.org/
This is an excellent presentation by Dr. Coleman. You might want to see my review of his book Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 on my free blog Not-the-NWO Book Reviews (tieresias.substack.com). I have a PhD in English literature so this is something I can do to contribute. I review books on the strategy, not tactics, of the cabal, focusing on the identities and organisation of the actors at the top. So for example I have not reviewed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.s magnificent The Real Anthony Fauci, which should have won him a Nobel prize.
Thanks for this, I read the Committee of 300 a little while back and thought... Hmmmm interesting... Definitely saw the wind back of industry over the years in the west, and though of Dr Coleman's book... Then the slow social debauchery and division of last ten to five years... But... Then in 2020, all this started, and OMG, full on... "It's happening" I thought to myself, I'd always considered this a far off thing, but they made their play, and many people fell for it.... The pain of knowledge to be trapped in this nightmare where most people have ZERO idea that they are being taken over is freaking me out... No matter how much I try some people are still trapped in the dream that everything is normal .. If more people were aware, they'd wake up quick... Thanks so much for this, so great to hear him speak these words... I must highly recommend the "Committee of 300" or his other book "One World Government"... Right now, very important books...
Take this great John Coleman video posted by Dr Ana, and this montage of the inhuman academic of the WEF, Yuval Noah Harari and you can see what's going on... If Yuval was on the news, people would be f*€#ing terrified...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Alhj4UwNWp2m/
Thank you Dr Ana for fighting on behalf of us all.
The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Great-Horse-Manure-Crisis-of-1894/
By the late 1800s, large cities all around the world were “drowning in horse manure”. In order for these cities to function, they were dependent on thousands of horses for the transport of both people and goods. In 1900, there were over 11,000 hansom cabs on the streets of London alone. There were also several thousand horse-drawn buses, each needing 12 horses per day, making a staggering total of over 50,000 horses transporting people around the city each day. To add to this, there were yet more horse-drawn carts and drays delivering goods around what was then the largest city in the world.
This huge number of horses created major problems. The main concern was the large amount of manure left behind on the streets. On average a horse will produce between 15 and 35 pounds of manure per day...Each horse also produced around 2 pints of urine per day and to make things worse, the average life expectancy for a working horse was only around 3 years. Horse carcasses therefore also had to be removed from the streets. The bodies were often left to putrefy so the corpses could be more easily sawn into pieces for removal.
****This problem came to a head when in 1894, The Times newspaper predicted… “In 50 years, every street in London will be buried under nine feet of manure.”***
It never happened. Why? The same reason Paul Ehrlicht, former catastrophic global cooler who became a catastrophic global warmer, just like Obama's absurd climate czar John Holdren (I have quotes from them claiming 50 years ago it was certain the next ice age was at hand, calling for - wait for it! - deindustrialization - and that reason is: *****MINDS MATTER MORE THAN MOUTHS.***** In theology, this is called prevenient grace, or common grace given to all mankind.
And yes, you are indeed correct: The WEF, Schwab, Soros, Gates, etc are too utterly STUPID to figure this out. Oh yes, they are connected; they get by on cronyism; and some are indeed idiot savants - brilliant in one area, but retarded in all others, and worse, many are utterly amoral.
Similarly, Julian Simon bet Paul Ehrlich, the Malthusian, that a basket of goods price would go down rather than up. Famous bet. If you don't know about it, read about it here https://fee.org/articles/how-julian-simon-won-1-000-bet-with-population-bomb-author-paul-ehrlich/ Ehrlich, just like the horse manure fanatics, lost. Ehrlich is in his 90s now, and still hasn't taken Obunglercare architect Zeke Emanuel's advice in the Atlantic Why I Hope to Die at 75 https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/why-i-hope-to-die-at-75/379329/
But then, NONE of them take Emanuel's advice, like Soros, ~ 95 yrs old, Kissinger ~ 100, the Clintons, now at least mid 70s, Biden ~ 80 etc. etc etc. But I don't blame them, as there is an actual, literal Hell, and shells of people do in fact go there (a good fictional example of this would be in CS Lewis' book The Great Divorce).
THEY are definitely retarding science and medicine!
I have a new take on lung physiology that dismisses the idea that gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide, are dissolved in our blood and are exchanged in the lungs.
My Substack article is titled: We breathe air not oxygen
I discuss the difference between air and oxygen and the cause of oxygen toxicity.
I discuss the role of salt - water must follow salt not lead in the equation of hydration
If we are to dismantle the multiple layers of medical retardation, this new way of viewing lung physiology must be explored robustly.
Underpinning my research is Peter Peterson’s free eBook available at smashwords
100 reasons water is not H2O
The corruption of how we are schooled to view water as a chemical equation is the MAJOR disruptor in science and medicine.
May curiosity be your friend
Jane333
Search: Smashwords – 100 Reasons Water Is Not H2O – a book by Peter Peterson
As Blaise Pascal once noted, once science is divorced from ethics, scientists will use their skills to pursue power, not truth. The late Dr. Michael Chricton wrote, similarly years later, “as Alston Chase put it, ‘when the search for truth is confused with political advocacy, the pursuit of knowledge is reduced to the quest for power.’” Or see the 2023 article by computer professor at Univ. of Washington, Militant Liberals Are Politicizing Artificial Intelligence
What is behind the global warming? The same thing that was behind the global cooling scare of the 1970s: The 1974 Club of Rome report titled, Mankind at the Turning Point stated, “The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” Their solution was simple – engineer a massive reduction in population and utterly change the socio-economic system through centralized planning via total government control. And yes, this does smack of being called “The Final Solution” to me, too. This “man is the enemy” was reiterated by the Club of Rome in 1993, as well, when they stated in their The First Global Revolution, downloadable at http://www.scribd.com/doc/2297152/Alexander-King-Bertrand-Schneider-The-First-Global-Revolution-Club-of-Rome-1993-Edition that “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” A full Club of Rome history can be found here, from the Club itself.
Or as Cornwall Alliance put it about Macron, at https://cornwallalliance.org/2022/09/modern-day-marie-antoinette-says-you-cannot-even-have-cake/#comment-82066 the French leader, leader in 2022 “And that, of course, is the genesis of the Macron pronouncement – the abundant life is not for the masses. There are just too many of them.
But what is weird is that despite the geometric growth in world population over the past century, there has also been geometric growth in the average standard of living for the world’s people. The “founder” of the belief, espoused in the Declaration of Independence, that each human has “inalienable rights” to life, liberty, and “the pursuit of happiness” is quoted as saying, “I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.”
So-called negative eugenicists even took things further, with some, like famed playwright George Bernard Shaw, calling for people to be called before a state-appointed board to justify their existence or be put to death.” The human response to this? Burgess Meredith put it simply in this 8 minute Twilight Zone episode, where Rod Serling notes in the world of what is today the WEF, “logic is an enemy and truth is a menace.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOYYCkVazBI
PJ Media put it this way in 2022 in The Great Reset: A Perfect Storm “As Dennis Meadows claims in a recent interview with the leftist online magazine Resilience, “I don’t know what a sustainable population level is now, but it’s probably much closer to a billion people, or fewer.” The authors are skeptical of growth as a function of what they call “overshoot,” of “go[ing] beyond limits accidentally,” which can ultimately produce an “ecological footprint” that is unsustainable. They do not recognize that growth and its negative offshoots can be managed without employing drastic solutions — solutions that are themselves a product of overshoot. “If a profound correction is not made soon,” they warn, “a crash of some sort is certain.” The trouble is, they are the crash.”
Today’s power elites are now saying, “You may not have an abundant life. Or as Maurice Strong, chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference – who promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to “save the environment” said, about his radical ecologist agenda: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General Secretary, Strong declared “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable. (emphasis added). Rockefeller Foundation official Alan Gregg, another outspoken globalist, recently declared that the world has cancer and that cancer is mankind – excluding himself, of course.
“We came up with the idea??” the Club of Rome asked? In other words, a conclusion had already been reached, and now they needed to create a “reason” to support their unsupported – and as Julian Simon provisionally demonstrated, possibly false - a priori assumptions. Do not try this technique in any school paper you may attempt, or you will be failed!
Regarding the last paragraph, please watch this special report. It'll rock your world: https://home.solari.com/future-science-the-wave-genome-with-ulrike-granogger/
Everything is based on the utterly, and provably, false assumption of Malthusianism.
It is all as the Anglican Reverend Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) wrote in hs first edition of the 1799 Essay on the Principle of Population:“We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.” And later, he added re. the lowborn: “I should propose a regulation to be made, declaring that no child born from any marriage taking place after the expiration of a year from the date of the law, and no illegitimate child born two years from the same date, should ever be entitled to parish assistance… The infant is, comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place.”
(In opposition to this were, e.g. Leibniz and economist Henry C Carey, 1793-1879. As Matt Ehret writes about Carey, who advised Lincoln during the Civil War, limits to population growth could be changed by encouraging progress! Hearkening back to the debate between Newton and Leibniz a century and a half earlier, Carey exposed the fallacy behind Mathus – and in the 1900s, the Ehrlichs, Holdrens, etc. – by writing in his Unity of Law: As Exhibited in the Relations of Physical, Social, Mental and Moral Science (1872):“Mr. Malthus was led to invent a law of population by means of which to relieve the rich and powerful from all responsibility for the existing state of things; giving them assurance that the poverty and wretchedness by which they were everywhere surrounded had resulted from the fact that the Creator had sent upon the earth large numbers of people for whom He had provided no table at which they might be allowed to eat, no materials by aid of which they might be clothed; thus furnishing the theory by aid of which subsequent writers have been enabled, as they supposed, to prove that, in the British Islands, man had become “a drug” and “population a nuisance.” Of course, The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 exposed that fallacy, as did the Simon/Ehrlich wager a century later, as well as their second following bet (which was rejected, but more nuanced). Simon’s worldview is simply summarized as “more people, more innovations, more value created, more abilities to deal with environmental problems.” Carey outlined a contrast with his two most influential works: Unity of Law and Harmony of Interests which is masterfully reviewed by Matt Ehret on his substack . Carey anticipated by 150 years the global warmers, citing that even back then to these types “man had become “a drug” and “population a nuisance.”
In contrast, the Carey, there is an interconnectedness of the powers of mind to the powers of nature: “The more his power of association, the greater is the tendency toward development of his various faculties; the greater becomes his control of the forces of nature, and the more perfect his own power for self-direction; mental force thus more and more obtaining control over that which is material, the labors of the present over the accumulations of the past…” Ehret summarizes this Malthus/Carey conflict thusly at https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/does-life-or-death-govern-the-universe-188?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=260045&post_id=84392812&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email : “Where Carey and his collaborators placed value on the power of human creative thought which gives the human species a unique power and duty to leap beyond the limits to growth in the process of acting as co-participants of universal creation, his enemies saw value in the worshipping of money and acquisition of property (which included other people). In order to counteract the optimistic spread of this science of political-economy as understood by Carey and his co-thinkers around the world during the latter half of the 19th century, much effort made to re-enforce the closed Newtonian system and its Malthusian corollaries to a new science that came to be dubbed “entropy.” Or think the war by the controllers today against the pro-growth, pro-freedom movement against, e.g., Klaus Schwab.
Words are important. We need to stop calling these psychopaths "the Elites" and start calling them what they really are, "the Unproductives."
behind satan there is always yahweh/enlil monster flesh and blood being pulling the strings... look up mauro biglino who translated the earliest ancient hebrew bibles and how they match up with sumerian history....
No weapon formed against me will succeed, thank you Jesus!
Years ago I read of a Russian scientist in the 1930's who found he could create plague in the human body by using radiowaves to create a negative form of pleomorphism, the same type of phenomenon that Raymond Royal Rife had witnessed changing viruses into bacteria and the bacteria into mold, but this Russian guy actually found a way to make that specific disease state with the accompanying pathogen, and working for the communists at the time, of course, that would be his natural demonic terrorist genocidal objective. This is how 5G is probably being used in combination with the cocktails of ingredients now found in the so-called mRNA COVID 'vaccines', mRNA-containing foods from animals that have eaten GM fodder, and the newer generation of mRNA COVID 'vaccine'-containing vegetables etc.
The only reason I skimmed through this post was the last paragraph:
"The elites protect themselves with herbal compounds mixed with sugar and the protection of low frequency radiation. Using the technology developed by the virologist Gurtjev (?) who proved that every living thing has a vibratory cycle. He was able to measure the vibratory cycle of deadly viruses. By vibrating them double their cycle you would kill them instantly. That is one of the defensive weapons they got that will kill the plague if they ever get it. The same technique will kill cancer cells. The medical profession run by the Rockefellers and pharmaceutical companies did not want you to know this."
So the elites have been using advanced and effective medical treatments that they somehow keep secret from all their underlings who are not allowed to get the treatments. Only the secret treatments of the elites are effective. That's a really far out conspiracy theory and I bet it has zero evidence to support it.
So the elites conspire to spread bioweapons on the earth with the knowledge that only themselves are protected. How does it feel to know that your treatments for COVID are likely not as effective as what the elites have? Does that described treatment sound plausible to you?
Alternative medicine has been around longer than the Club of Rome, founded in 1968. So what the elites are using is some kind of alternative medicine that does not sound all that advanced to me.
I could not find the book, but there is a pdf of his title, "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300" available on pdf: https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf
Every one of those “clubs” is controlled by the Khazarian Mafia.
In a word, Satan hates God, and everything in His image (yes, His).