One of my substack subscribers sent me this presentation by Mik Anderson. It is excellent and explains the technicalities of how this network works. I do not know Mik Anderson, but want to thank him profoundly and my subscriber very much for this brilliant information. It is important that people understand in concise ways how the technology works and these images allow complex information to be understood. I have copied most of the the PDF below but the full presentation is available clicking on this link:
I have struggled for months with the complicated science of this matter. I am pretty much where I started, lost. What is lacking in Dr. Ana's Substack is an editor who can rewrite, simplify and explain its science and its scientific assertions for the lay reader. Also missing is an editor's overview, an executive summary, that explains in lay terms why it's important and what readers can do about it.
This video goes along with your article - Covid Vaccine Nanotechnology - The Intra Body Nano Network - The BLUETOOTH / MAC Phenomenon & NANO NETWORKS - Mik Andersen Corona2Inspect.net
Sounds like our bodies are sending and receiving information. Unfortunately, someone other than ourselves receives and sends. Our body just does what it is told.
Thank you for posting this, and thank you Mik Anderson. A lot of these images came from papers posted on La Quinta Columna over two years ago. One of the challenges for non-scientists is that basic biological understanding of human bodies is lacking from our terribly weakened "education system." I honestly do not know how to make this slide set simpler for laypersons to understand! Do people understand the difference between nano- and micro-? In your interview with Maria Zee, you mentioned monatomic...people do not understand that the graphene is ONE molecule thick; it makes no sense to people who have never even looked into a microscope...I am so very sad for humanity now.
Wow thanks! This is a bunch of very necessary information the entire human species needs right now. Very very eye opening to say the least. Please distribute widely.
Just so readers know, when I clicked on the link for the .pdf file, it was blank (24 pages). BUT, after I downloaded it, it did come across, all of it. So, it looks like you need to download it to read it or to print it out.
The final graphic has the smart phone as 'The Gateway'...what to think of this? I have been assuming that all the intra network body components would be responding directly to EMF'S/magnetic source/LED etc etc in the environment....with the phone being one ( but pretty critical, the more finally tuned?) aspect of the weaponry deployed.
My smart phone is well on the blink anyway (the calculated obsolesence?) ....and surely time to dispose of fully...and just use old 3/4G Nokia...
Geez. Lunatics have been conspiring for years. Still wonder if Trump and cronies are in on it. Waking up the people doesn't mean $hit if they're being lulled and misled.
"The GQDs, far from being a defect in the network, play
a fundamental role since their size allows them to
function or operate as nano-antennas. But they also
conduct through the circulatory system, arteries, veins,
capillaries, acting as electrical markers, but also
biological since they adsorb proteins and other
components present in the blood."
So, the GQDs are able to potentially collect proteins and other materials on their surfaces, presumably to alter potentials. To do this would they not have to interact with the electrostatic charge of the given protein molecule or other unnamed component?
Where is the "current coming from?"
Is this theoretical, or has it been observed with electron microscopy?
If this occurs in small vessels, how long before an infarct occurs?
Yesterday i flicked onto GBNews tv channel and Judge at the Old Bailey was live. She was explaining in horrible detail of the attack by the guy in Ilford E. London on young woman. Listening to it, and particularly how he kept leaving then returning, to stamp on her more , so calculated and brutal, I was picturing it and wondering what the hell IS a person doing this!
The way we are being taken over by this nanotech may well explain it? It was more than an enraged psychopath in action...he was being controlled to do this.?.. it was robotic enactment...
I cant observe any happenings any longer without thinking..."is this is due to the person, or the internal tech infitration of body"...
Outstanding information. Thank you.
I have struggled for months with the complicated science of this matter. I am pretty much where I started, lost. What is lacking in Dr. Ana's Substack is an editor who can rewrite, simplify and explain its science and its scientific assertions for the lay reader. Also missing is an editor's overview, an executive summary, that explains in lay terms why it's important and what readers can do about it.
Incredible, reminds, these sociopathic creatures of Dr. Frankenstein.
This video goes along with your article - Covid Vaccine Nanotechnology - The Intra Body Nano Network - The BLUETOOTH / MAC Phenomenon & NANO NETWORKS - Mik Andersen Corona2Inspect.net
https://odysee.com/@GMNMedia:9/REVIEW-The-MAC-phenomenon-and-the-intra-body-nano-network-of-communications:c
Linking both tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
good job, I mirrored it at bss.org
Sounds like our bodies are sending and receiving information. Unfortunately, someone other than ourselves receives and sends. Our body just does what it is told.
Thank you for posting this, and thank you Mik Anderson. A lot of these images came from papers posted on La Quinta Columna over two years ago. One of the challenges for non-scientists is that basic biological understanding of human bodies is lacking from our terribly weakened "education system." I honestly do not know how to make this slide set simpler for laypersons to understand! Do people understand the difference between nano- and micro-? In your interview with Maria Zee, you mentioned monatomic...people do not understand that the graphene is ONE molecule thick; it makes no sense to people who have never even looked into a microscope...I am so very sad for humanity now.
Is this analysis projected for everyone who took the jabs? Are the people dying after the jabs a picture of the Dr Frankenstein experiment gone wrong?
If you go in telegram chanel of ASTRID STUCKELBERGER she has this also with 169 studies posted after it.
Wow thanks! This is a bunch of very necessary information the entire human species needs right now. Very very eye opening to say the least. Please distribute widely.
Just so readers know, when I clicked on the link for the .pdf file, it was blank (24 pages). BUT, after I downloaded it, it did come across, all of it. So, it looks like you need to download it to read it or to print it out.
The final graphic has the smart phone as 'The Gateway'...what to think of this? I have been assuming that all the intra network body components would be responding directly to EMF'S/magnetic source/LED etc etc in the environment....with the phone being one ( but pretty critical, the more finally tuned?) aspect of the weaponry deployed.
My smart phone is well on the blink anyway (the calculated obsolesence?) ....and surely time to dispose of fully...and just use old 3/4G Nokia...
LA QUINTA COLUMNA CON EL LADRON RICARDO DELGADO COPIO ESTA INFORMACION, Y MOSTRO COMO QUE FUERON LOS DESCUBRIDORES.
Geez. Lunatics have been conspiring for years. Still wonder if Trump and cronies are in on it. Waking up the people doesn't mean $hit if they're being lulled and misled.
"The GQDs, far from being a defect in the network, play
a fundamental role since their size allows them to
function or operate as nano-antennas. But they also
conduct through the circulatory system, arteries, veins,
capillaries, acting as electrical markers, but also
biological since they adsorb proteins and other
components present in the blood."
So, the GQDs are able to potentially collect proteins and other materials on their surfaces, presumably to alter potentials. To do this would they not have to interact with the electrostatic charge of the given protein molecule or other unnamed component?
Where is the "current coming from?"
Is this theoretical, or has it been observed with electron microscopy?
If this occurs in small vessels, how long before an infarct occurs?
Yesterday i flicked onto GBNews tv channel and Judge at the Old Bailey was live. She was explaining in horrible detail of the attack by the guy in Ilford E. London on young woman. Listening to it, and particularly how he kept leaving then returning, to stamp on her more , so calculated and brutal, I was picturing it and wondering what the hell IS a person doing this!
The way we are being taken over by this nanotech may well explain it? It was more than an enraged psychopath in action...he was being controlled to do this.?.. it was robotic enactment...
I cant observe any happenings any longer without thinking..."is this is due to the person, or the internal tech infitration of body"...