“Shedding” – Understanding Self spreading vaccines in the Setting of Novel mRNA Technology

Discussing Observations and Sounding the Alarm - What is the Truth?

Since the rollout of the Covid19 shots, many people have seen and experienced unusual symptoms. The term “shedding” has been used a lot and fact checkers have supposedly debunked the idea, because there is no alive virus in the mRNA gene product.

In the conventional medical understanding, shedding has been found after vaccine administration in different settings. It means that virus particles are being produced by the vaccinated individual and excreted in body fluids like saliva, feces, and aerosolized from breath. For example, after administration of the human neonatal rotavirus vaccine, the rotavirus was detected in the stool on days 3 to 7 and it was found in 70% of neonates.

Rotavirus shedding following administration of RV3-BB human neonatal rotavirus vaccine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28481726/

Viral shedding documented in nasal passages after live attenuated influenza vaccine has also been documented.

Viral Shedding in Recipients of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in the 2016-2017 and 2017- 2018 Influenza Seasons in the United Kingdom

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31642899/

This virus shedding can lead to vaccinated people spreading the very disease that they have been vaccinated against.

The term” shedding” considered when speaking about self-spreading vaccines is a slightly different concept. It has been researched in animal populations how to design vaccines that would be spread automatically, for example via skin contact, through exchange of body fluids and passed on in breast milk.

Self-disseminating vaccines to suppress zoonoses (nature.com)

There has been longstanding development of such vaccines even to sterilize animal populations and allow contraception to be spread from animal to animal. This was done in Spain in 2001 and the vaccine spread to more than half of the 300 rabbits on the Menorca Island.

Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?

https://thebulletin.org/2020/09/scientists-are-working-on-vaccines-that-spread-like-a-disease-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/

Luigi Warren is known for his work with Derrick Rossi, the co-founder of the mRNA shot producing Moderna and he stated in 2021:

“I believe the shedding idea is that the vaccinated shed spike protein, not virus. And it is certainly true that people vaccinated with mRNA vaccines shed spike protein but its miniscule in amounts and cannot induce malaise/fatigue in others.”

https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/mrna-technology-pioneer-says-covid-19-vaccinated-people-can-shed-spike-protein-twitter-says-delete-this-1809062-2021-05-31

How does he know, I wonder, since miniscule amounts of spike protein with plasma creates clots resistant to dissolution by the human fibrinolysis system?

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis: implications for microclot formation in COVID-19.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8380922/

What do the Pfizer documents say about shedding?

 Excerpts from: A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure

Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.

 8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy

 An EDP occurs if:

• A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. • A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

• A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:

• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception. The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

• If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:

 • A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

• A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.

(…)However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.

 8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure

 An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.

It is evident from this writing that inhaling the air around a vaccinated person or touching their skin is considered so dangerous that it must be reported as an adverse event within 24 hours. Additionally, someone who has been exposed can pass this on to another unvaccinated person. Clearly this is describing self-spreading dangerous vaccines. My question is this: If this exposure was dangerous enough to be reported as an adverse event why are we not advising the public that it is dangerous to inhale the air around vaccinated people and touch their skin – because it may vaccinate the recipient?

Many doctors do not want to consider the issue of shedding because there is “No Data”. Recent studies indicate scientifically that shedding indeed is real.

Nasal swabs from children living in vaccinated households revealed detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG, while no SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody were detected in the nasal swabs obtained from children in nonvaccinated households.

Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1

Reports of Shedding Effects and my clinical observations

After rollout of the Covid19 mRNA products many unvaccinated people have been complaining about medical symptoms after getting close to vaccinated individuals. Women reported menstrual irregularities, hemorrhaging even in girls as young as two years old and women as old as 92. The increase in menstrual irregularities and decidual cast shedding (passing tissue close to the size of the uterus associated with abdominal pain and bleeding) has been documented by mycyclestory.com. The most striking finding of their published study is the remarkable incidence of decidual cast shedding (DCS) among the survey respondents, which identified 292 women noting a DCS event over 7.5 months in 2021. In comparison, all previously published medical literature spanning 109 years describes less than 40 cases. There was a 2000% increase in 2021 of DCS reported. The study did not report vaccination status but questioned the correlation to vaccine rollout.  

COVID19 and the surge in Decidual Cast Shedding

https://www.thegms.co/publichealth/pubheal-ra-22041401.pdf

However, in the self-reported symptoms section unvaccinated women gave testimony about their menstrual bleeding when in proximity to vaccinated individuals. Many started hemorrhaging within hours and miscarriages were reported. These heartbreaking and shocking evidential testimonials are listed here:

https://www.thegms.co/publichealth/pubheal-ra-22041401-Patient-Testimonials-MyCycleStory.pdf

Here are some examples of my own experiences with unvaccinated patients complaining in my medical practice of possible shedding:

I have seen women complaining about immediate and extreme hemorrhaging within a couple hours of being in close vicinity with a recently vaccinated person. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus shortly after a roommate got vaccinated, another person had a life-threatening pulmonary embolus shortly after exposure to vaccinated people. Multiple new and recurrent aggressive cancers within 6-12 months of a family member getting vaccinated. Large amounts of people reported headaches, muscle and joint paints, heart palpitations, blood pressure abnormalities. Many developed Covid symptoms within 1-2 days of being around asymptomatic vaccinated individuals.

I started checking the D-Dimer test in unvaccinated people that were concerned about shedding. This is a test done to check for blood clotting and first gained public awareness when Dr. Charles Hoffe tested D-Dimer levels in vaccinated patients and found a rate of 60% elevated tests. To my growing concern, a large amount of unvaccinated people without any blood clot history indeed had elevated D-Dimers.

I started them on a protocol including Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Hisperidin Diosimin, Plasmanex, Aspirin, Epithalon and high dose Vitamin C infusions with IV Glutathione and Alpha Lipoic Acid. Some were also on Methylene Blue in addition to Neo 40 (Nitric Oxide supplement), DMG (Dimethylglycine). This was in addition to their baseline supplements with Zinc, Quercetin, NAC, Vitamin C & D and other full Vitamin supplementation regimen as well as other individual interventions if indicated. D-Dimer improvement and complete reversal back to normal was observed within 1-2 months of treatment initiation.

I created this video to explain my findings in my clinical practice and discuss different cases as well as successful laboratory testing normalization.

D-Dimer Elevation in the Unvaccinated. A Marker of Shedding?

https://rumble.com/v14n6aa-d-dimer-elevation-in-the-unvaccinated.-a-marker-of-shedding.html

Summary and Recommendations

As an Internal Medicine and Functional Medicine Physician, I am highly concerned about the silence surrounding this issue of self-spreading mRNA particles. We are assuming that it is the spike protein and not other nanoparticles that are being transferred, but we do not know for certain. Given the number of adverse events that are reported from the mRNA shots and the long-term health impacts, this begs the question if undiagnosed vaccine shedding also has long term side effects. For example, I have an unvaccinated patient who was exposed to vaccinated family, had an elevated D-Dimer, and now has micro clotting in the eyes with severely and progressively impaired eyesight. Is this from prior Covid or shedding?  I am also concerned about the temporal incidence of cancer that I have seen in young people who were in contact with a vaccinated partner, with no family history of cancer present. I have listed my other observations and they are all unsettling to me. The idea that a short contact of minutes of an unvaccinated woman with a vaccinated person can induce severe, immediate hemorrhaging within 1-2 hours of exposure begs the question – what is being transmitted that is so powerful to induce such a severe physical reaction so fast? If we are projecting mass casualties from the mRNA technology as indicated by rising all cause mortality in the vaccinated, should we not also be concerned about accelerated aging and adverse health effects in the unvaccinated exposed to “shedding”? In which case, is the remedy the distancing from vaccinated persons to protect the unvaccinated from unforeseen health risks? Should we not actively screen all patients for possible shedding effects as I am doing in my practice and finding such abnormal results? At this time, we have many unanswered questions and assumed answers, since we do not even know what exactly is in these shots. What if the health of unvaccinated people is in real danger by us not addressing this question?

I recommend a most urgent scientific discussion and investigation in this potential public health threat.