25 Comments

I watched the Hearings and read later hes going to have ahard time getting confirmed. D were so rude and uglee in comments and facial expression it was embarassing. Hes got more knowlede about Health than more than maybe a few in Medical Field. And they question him Lobbying when they both Sides made Millions? Kettle/Pot? Pray he is Confirmed We are at a turning point in our Future

Expand full comment

It sounds like they are actually going after compounding pharmacies. And it's beyond ironic for them to stop peptides for lack of safety and efficacy studies when not one single childhood vaccine required for children to attend school has EVER been tested for safety and efficacy. Not against a neutral (saline) placebo, not in a double-blind study, and not for time enough for safety signals to show up.

Expand full comment

AI tech could further exacerbate vaccine harm with more heavy metals in the environment - why shutting off wifi at night is a good idea - helps our brains clear neurotoxins via our CSF:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/autism

Expand full comment

Why just shut it off?

Ethernet is common and people do not Have to have wifi to have internet. Use hard wired cables instead.

Or use a separate wifi router on a power strip from your main internet router, put the power strip up on the wall or somewhere accessible and just flip the switch when you actually Need wifi. Then turn it off when you're done.

Or if you find yourself forgetting to turn it off, you can also get a power strip with a timer built in, and set the times you want it to be on and off.

Expand full comment

Elizabeth Warren was Shocked, Shocked that Bobby made $2.5 million from suing Pharma, while she's taken at least $3. 6 million from the Medical Industrial complex. Some Republicans may vote for Bobby, just to see Dems twirl.

Expand full comment

Maybe for those over 35 year old who want to experiment with drugs otherwise vexxxines ought to be banned

Expand full comment

Whaly are so many people refusing to acknowledge the 2015 Rothschild covid-19 test kit patent application? It was granted/published in March of 2017, nearly 3 years prior to Sarscov2 being "discovered!" Now what could of been happening in late 2015 that could have possibly caused the evil unseen powers that be to implement their covid-19 plan? These so called elite did the whole covid-19 thing in an attempt to make Trump's first presidential campaign null and void. The name Sarscov2 or Covid-19 did not officially exist in 2015 or 2017 so how is it all over Rothschild's patent application!

Expand full comment

Still a fan of Mr. Warp Speed who still hasn't denounced the demon jabs, and won't? In fact, he's now promoting the same trans-humanizing technology for cancer "vaccines." RFK, Jr. has to be in on the gig.

They're all in on it, from the (s)elections to the policies, but they play a game many of us are finally waking up to. It's an insidiously deceptive and satanic version of the Harlem Globetrotters v. the Washington Generals but without the catchy music. Note how the Globetrotters (and jetsetting globalists) always win in their rigged game, because they're working WITH the Washington Generals, et al.

Yes, "Covid-19" is documented to have been planned and the terrible serums manufactured afore the pretend fact of the hyped "illness" suddenly appearing in 2019 (quelle surprise!), while the Truther movement says next to nothing about this real criminal conspiracy and the complicity of the "whole of governments" and corporations around the world in their mass assault upon humanity. How were nearly all of them lined up in "lockstep" fashion? Are they all pawns or true believers of the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and the other usual suspects? Or, of the UN, WHO, and WEF, or intel agencies, Jesuits, Freemasons, and occultism? Perhaps all of these phony philanthropists, authorities, agencies, and secret societies serve the same master?

Look at bloodlines important to the creeps of this world, and then realize who our sold-out puppet leaders are.

Expand full comment

Well said !!!

In my opinion your questions are very telling in identifying all of the players that are involved. Are they all involved ?

My answer is yes and they all do serve the same master.

Satan himself.

Expand full comment

Maybe I don't understand it well enough, but isn't AI only as intelligent as the information it is programmed with?

Expand full comment

In a sense, yes AI is only as intelligent as the initial information fed to it, but it is also programmed to compare many bits/bytes/parcels of information and glean from one or more sources, then arriving at some conclusion which may or may not be true. We've all seen some of the most hilarious examples of answers provided by ChatGTP in response to questions, that are not meant to be "trick questions". There was one instance where the AI bot told a person "to go kill yourself". That is certainly not funny, and could do horrendous damage to a person suffering depression or other mental or emotional ailment.

My 2 cents is that all of AI is overrated because investers want their investments in AI companies to do well and give them nice dividends, or huge rise in stock price, and because BigPharma wants the gullible public to buy the lie that AI can revolutionize the medical and health field in a positive way. Actually nothing good can ever come from AI taking over health and medicine.

And most importantly, but least talked about is the incorporation of AI into nanotech that is slowly spreading through all living organisms on the planet. Think of it as a control grid where eventually all animals, including humans, and plants may be contaminated with nanotechnology controlled by AI, via the Cloud. It is now our job to constantly remove the metals which serve as antennae, plus to remove anything else that does not belong in our blood stream or our bodies.

Thanks to Dr. Ana and to some of the posts in response to her articles, we are learning ways to detox.

Expand full comment

Dr. Mihalcea,

Have you researched Spermidine efficacy as in the product Nocovidium?

THANK you for all your efforts. I appreciate and respect you greatly.

Jerry Wheeler

Expand full comment

Iread here those who want to continue vaccinating themself should be able to continue to do so ,it's according to free will.But as shedding has been recognized as real ,do the vacced individuals have also the right to shed on us ?

Expand full comment

This!

Expand full comment

"Dismanteling the corrupt FDA regulations will be key for our healthy future". It ain't the 'regulations' which are corrupt, it's the people and how they interpret those words -or choose not to.

Expand full comment

Am a huge fan of Dr. Mihlacea, but have to thoroughly, even vigorously disagree with her following sentiment and apparently that of nominee Mr. Health whose position is to keep mRNA tech legal and available for authorities to push on us, while framing such a sold-out stance as libertarian goodness:

"I agree with Mr. Kennedy, those who want to continue to vaccinate themselves and continue using other Big Pharma chemicals, have the free will to do it."

Most of us have seen or experienced how these faux vaccines shed and cause great harm forever; indeed, even so-called traditional vaccines for humans and animals were leaky and spread affliction to others.

Why should it be a matter of CHOICE to take poisons that shed on and afflict others? This "mRNA" nano-satanic technology needs to be banned, which Dr. Ana does agree with, but, if it's not, and it won't be, this "freedom to choose" based on lies, propaganda and coercion, is, in fact, no freedom of choice at all. Worse, when this tech is not banned, the free-choicers unwittingly, along with the behemoth of poison purveyors, would shift the debate from the fault of the current spreading intergenerational genocide lying with corrupt and ritually mass-murdering oligarchs and officials in government, the military, medicine, education, corporations, and other institutions to it being solely OUR fault.

In other words, too bad for you if your spouse, neighbor, officemate, classmate, store clerk, doctor, or your own child jabbed with permission of her other parent sheds on you and you now have severe problems and forever nanotech and pernicious polymers in your blood. You can only blame them and yourself for being around them. It was their and your choice.

Expand full comment

No one is getting in the door if they say "Yes I want To Ban Vaccines."

And no one is getting in the door if they say "The Covid vaxxes have shed to us all".

But you have to get in the door to have a say, otherwise you are just standing outside the house ranting and no one cares.

Plus it actually makes me feel good they all railed against him for all their time yesterday and that they are lining up today...

that means he is really on our side or they would not hate him so much.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend... for today.

Expand full comment

If we say we are for "free choice" to take spreading vaccine poisons and know it's not an actual option of discrete and individual choice, then it will be on us. If Trump and Kennedy are saying this, they are leading us into a most terrible trap. They very much sound as if they're framing the issue as one of choice, which it isn't, because mRNA tech is highly transmissible. Worse, lying authorities are telling us a big pandemic, or four, are coming up soon and that they'll have mRNA tech jabs and other therapeutics to protect us. It's all a plan.

If the HHS nominee has to lie about or obfuscate his intentions to Congress, then, once in office, where will he suddenly find the political power to enact a major ban on mRNA tech or to expose the poisonous nature of all vaccines? Nowhere.

Trump has come out publicly in favor of mRNA cancer therapy, and he won't abandon this position. Over the last several years of his being out of office, he hasn't said "boo" over his big beautiful vaccines, with all of the documented damage they have done and will continue to inflict on people and animals. The tech is even being inserted into plants. They're building an Internet of Things and Humans, and this terrible and not at all optional nasty tech is key to building the bio-digital convergence of people, money, and machine.

Today, Trump and all other politicians, CEOs, technocrats, and Generals are all players. We are our own worst enemies when we make excuses for them and deny the truth. There is NO real contention in our government; it's an act for us. All of the world's power structures are playing to script, which is entitled, "Entitled: We Get to Hurt, Mind-Control, and Exterminate Most of You and Lie About Everything so You Don't Believe What's Actually Happening Until It's Too Late."

Expand full comment

Hope for the best, plan for the worst. I didnt need Dr Anas checklist the other day though, I was already doing or have done all of those things. Still, it was good advice.

But I think RFK is the best shot we have at the moment, and they Absolutely do not want him to get in... so he still may not, but the fact that they hate him inspires confidence.

Good luck to you in any case.

Expand full comment

Right. It's too bad most of us have been complacent and in denial as to permit a rotten system to continue to the point that the sell-outs, liars, and outright creeps have the upper hand.

Remember how the grassroots Tea Party was viciously attacked and discredited, successfully, because of its values of integrity and individual dignity? That was when more of us should have joined the Constitutional and responsible protests, instead of backing off. I know I'm guilty of having been too busy at the time and unable to handle the flack/ flak such would entail.

Then, the more recent January 6 protests were engineered by government agents to defame their worthy cause and frame them as criminals, and with the DOJ's unconscionable cooperation.

Looks as if we are left with hope. And prayer. And trying to create on a personal scale what we'd like to see happen at large. Perhaps attitude and local creation is more scalable than we have been led to believe and will make an appreciable difference.

Best to you, too.

Expand full comment

Dr would you please add a donate icon to your homepage?

Expand full comment

It sounds like marketing of Theranos v2.0

"The marketing line of Theranos was centered around its promise of a revolutionary blood-testing technology that was simpler, cheaper, and more efficient than existing methods. Elizabeth Holmes, the founder and CEO, marketed Theranos as a company that would transform healthcare with its innovative technology, which was claimed to be capable of running a wide range of tests using just a few drops of blood. This marketing strategy emphasized the ease and accessibility of the tests, suggesting that individuals could obtain blood test results without a doctor's order, potentially making healthcare more proactive and personalized."

Expand full comment

video not playing 😢😢

Expand full comment

James Grundvig is a LLOSER.

I will not watch anything this BOZO is involved in. DO NOT REPOST ANYTHING THIS JERK OFF HAS TO SAY!

Expand full comment