123 Comments

Finding no mRNA in the vaccines makes perfect sense. It's unlikely the technology even exists to produce such a vaccine at scale, and since the people at the top likely know there's no virus, what would be the point of mRNA to produce a fictional virus spike protein anyway?

I don't see any evidence for "artificial intelligence hydrogel" in the vaccines either, or that such a thing exists, and it's certainly not necessary to explain the vaccine effects.

Hydrogel is gelatin, and thus synthetic hydrogel is just plastic gelatin. The technology exists to effect simple changes in the gelatin using heat, light, magnetism, salt, etc, but there's no 'intelligence' or even simple electronics involved. It's a simple structural material.

Regarding the 'quantum dot' excerpts, where's the evidence that they exist or are in the vaccines? The people claiming to be making them are also claiming they're modeling them after a 'virus' that's fiction. They can't find the virus, but they can make synthetic, nano-scale replicas of what it would look like if it was real? Hmm... sorry, not buying it by a long-shot.

All of the evidence points to the 'spike protein', and even the whole 'virus' sequences reportedly coming from human samples, being human cellular debris from dying cells.

So hypothetically, if the military started adding graphene oxide to the geoengineering aerosols in late 2019/early 2020, and people started inhaling it and absorbing it into the blood and tissues, causing blood coagulation and hypoxemia in the acute cases, exposed people's 'immune response' against this never-before-seen toxin would be something new. In other words, the people would exhibit a subtle genetic 'mutation' that's the code for the adaptation to the new toxin, which the virologists falsely claim is from a 'virus'.

If that's accurate, then by injecting graphene oxide with the 'vaccine', obviously the body's defensive response would show the same genetic adaptation as the people who were inhaling the graphene oxide in the air, and the virologists would do their thing and say "see, we found the same 'spike protein' genetic markers in the vaccinated people and the 'covid' people, so our vaccine works".

And the pathologists would find the 'spike protein' genetic markers in the dead people full of graphene oxide whether they got it from the air, the vaccines, or both.

Also, it was already well-documented in the toxicology research on graphene oxide by 2018 that part of the body's immune response in the blood is the production of fibroblasts, as I mentioned in my comments on your graphene article a few months ago. So the fibrous blood clots are explained.

And finally, I also challenge the claims of microchips (meaning micro-electronics) in the vaccines. I've looked at the photos from many different sources, and the phenomena of the geometric-shaped objects is almost certainly the natural crystallization of minerals, which we know are plentiful in the vaccines. I have some background in electrical technology, and to me it's like looking at a brick and saying it's a miniature, fully-functional van, because it looks similar in shape to a van. Self-assembling nano-computer chips are fiction, and it's feeding fear in people who don't understand electronics to call these crystalline objects computer chips in the complete absence of real evidence.

Have we not learned from the horrific example of virology that we must be disciplined in being guided by scientific evidence? And have we not learned that the claims in published 'scientific' papers, especially from establishment sources, should be considered fiction until proven otherwise?

Expand full comment

I'm not in the position to comment on this really other than describe my personal experience and observations: I lived in an area (Newfoundland) where -since I lived there from 2015- there were NO chemtrails. Until in 2019 they started spraying heavily, oddly enough it started shortly after a visit from Obama to the island. I'm very aware of chemtrails after living in Europe for years. In December of 2019 is when the coughing started in my own kids and in other school kids: a persistent cough that lasted for many weeks. During the convid hoax that followed, they recommended everything that's bad for you: distancing, fear, stress, masks etc. Except they wanted kids in schools with the windows open, in de middle of winter. Especially in European countries schools had their windows wide open and kids were sitting with winter coats in the classrooms. I'm all for fresh air, but why did they purposely want to expose kids to 'fresh' air, while otherwise recommending everything that's bad? Was it because they hoped they would breathe GO and develop a certain genetic adaptation?

Expand full comment

Great "observation"!!!

And us in duh USA had the "con-trails' / chem-trails... beginning in the 1980s, not to out do ya!

And they DESTROYED the "Ozone" layer via "geothermal engineering" world-wide in the 90s, that DUH "Dead heads" call climate change!

SO NO MORE Purification via "OZONE" for all LIFE on this planet!

Well except for the 4000 to 5000 MILES of under-ground-super-living tunnels for the super rich, and that would include the "Military Into-2-Dust-2-ya'll Complexes" whom are also, the super rich destroying this earth, for pleasure, and profit!

And as the "side benefit" for THEM, De-pop-U-lation!

Expand full comment

The spraying has been ramping up for decades in the US, but I too noticed a significant increase in 2019.

It's tough to figure out motives for the crazy things the schools put the kids through. Some of the explanation is that a lot of people are very afraid and weren't rational even in good times, and just became mentally unhinged. And I suspect that somewhere at the top, there was a hope that by making kids sit in freezing classrooms, some would get a cold or the flu which they could then call a 'covid' case.

Expand full comment

Do you have any thoughts on the observation of people emitting a Bluetooth signal post "vaccination"? With a unique address that never corresponds to any known device or manufacturer- every time another device scans to find other Bluetooth devices?

Expand full comment

I haven't figured that one out yet. When I have some time I need to learn a bit more about the specifics of Bluetooth technology. My hypothesis at this point is that when the Bluetooth device is scanning, the signal it's transmitting is being reflected back off of the vaccinated person. The graphene oxide in the person, especially combined with iron in the blood, makes the person super conductive and magnetic, and I'm thinking the body must be acting as a magnetic transducer and reflector.

If I were experimenting, one of the things I'd do is see if multiple different devices of different types are picking up different addresses from the same person, which would indicate a random effect along the lines of my hypothesis.

This is just one of the many examples where people are finding some phenomena from the vaccines, and then not investigating to determine causation because they think they know the cause. There's no such thing as a self-assembling nano-Bluetooth chip, and even if there was it would have no power supply, so there is another explanation. And I'm keeping an open mind.

Expand full comment

From memory, they had another device in one of the studies - maybe it was this tablet at 15:10 in the Mexican Comusav experiment: https://www.bitchute.com/video/07rUgNbNCIjz/ and I have a vaguer memory that they did get the same address on both.

The earlier French experiment is here: https://rumble.com/v1lwiri-the-big-reset-movie-the-uncensored-truth-of-the-pandemic.html Their report is here: https://efvv.eu/images/content/2021/1223/experience-bt-v2-fr-es-uk_02715.pdf

Expand full comment

Iron is a blood compound and until 2021 no one was magnetic. With rGO introduced in vaccines it makes people magnetic. And this aspect bothers the False Dissent a lot, since it cannot explain magnetism with the spike protein or the mRNA.

We agree on many points

Expand full comment

Perhaps I did not explain the part about obtaining a unique media access code from jabbed people- every time a device is used to scan for other Bluetooth devices. My experience has been that using the same device to scan the same individual or several jabbed people- a unique MAC will be obtained with every scan. Which as far as I understand is what could be expected from a wireless network capable Bluetooth device- that a dynamic MAC will be generated for every tentative scan by other Bluetooth capable devices. The dynamic MAC lasting either the duration of an a scan, a connection or a second short of 24 hours. The possibility of two devices within Bluetooth range generating the same MAC in the same 24 hour period being somewhat remote. That each jabbed individual is generating who knows how many dynamic MACs in the course of a day. Brings all new meaning to the Stefan-Boltzman blackbody law of "all bodies absorb and emit EM radiation, all the time."

Expand full comment

Well you know more about Bluetooth than I do. I'd need to spend a few hours studying up on it, and at this point I don't see a reason.

I think your logic error is in assuming that any jabbed individual is generating any MAC address. A phone picking up a MAC address near such a person is not proof, and not even solid evidence, that the person is "generating" any such code.

I searched "Bluetooth device phantom mac address", and there's endless hits on tech blogs describing random/phantom MAC addresses mysteriously being picked up by devices, starting about 4 years ago.

Having people walk near a iphone in the woods isn't going to prove anything useful.

A simple experiment could prove or disprove the theory. Put the jabbed person in a small room that's a Faraday cage, with just an antenna inside, that's connected to a RF receiver that can scan/receive the frequencies that Bluetooth uses, and prove that jabbed people are transmitting a Bluetooth signal on those frequencies.

A phone/tablet/laptop cannot be part of a scientific experiment to find the source of the MAC address. There's too many variables. The phone is transmitting, so could cause some type of reflection phenomena, and it's got ultra-complex hardware and software that could be generating a phantom randomly or for god only knows what reason.

Expand full comment

Here you are wrong, there is scientific literature explaining the process of Bluetooth signals with nanorouters. Precisely an Spaniard with hundreds of articles and patents is responsible for this.

Of course, this technology requires radio frequency power. In a Faraday cage there will be no results, but if it is exposed to microwaves, the party begins.

Expand full comment

What specifically in my above statement is "wrong"? That's just a childish statement that bars debate or learning.

What's called a "nanorouter" is a pocket-sized router. Show me scientific evidence that anyone has made one a million times smaller, that self-assembled from basic elements in liquid.

Indeed, there's thousands of published papers that tout 'nanobots' that can travel around inside the body, and the claims are all BS if you actually look at what they're doing; just elementary particles that they're moving with lasers or magnetism.

People are lost in BS and arguing over misunderstood definitions. What academia calls a 'nanobot' is an iron particle that they can move inside tissues with electric coils placed around the microscope, or some other simple material and process, while the public reads only the headline and imagines the fictional nanobots in Star Trek.

Expand full comment

Well, perhaps you could provide us a process, a mechanism, refer us to at least the one progress article or study, some demonstrated examples of this "reflective MAC generation" phenomenon?

There's really a lot of your own previous statements I could highlight that suggest Science is really neither your background nor your thing. From your initial paragraph on this thread of Mar 16 " It's unlikely the technology even exists to produce such a vaccine at scale..." Yeah it does, has done since antiquity. You are familiar with fermentation?

You remind me of a fellow I studied with about thirty years ago. He simply could not conceive of the existence or reality of anything that either he had not heard of, or could not find in literature.

One particular day it was evident he had changed overnight. He was paced to one side at a right angle, on his motorbike for a distance of kilometres over a major metropolitan bridge on his way to his night job- by a bar fridge sized glowing/ luminescent green orb.

I wish you a similar life changing experience.

Expand full comment

Wow, I point out why the cell phone phenomena doesn't prove anything, and suggest a scientific experiment that could prove or disprove the claims, and you come back with a blanket ad hominem attack and wishing me harm. Truth has that effect on dark people.

I did not claim that the cause of the phantom MAC addresses was reflection. It's merely one of many possibilities. RFID systems use reflection of energy.

Your claim that production of the claimed 'spike protein mRNA encased in lipid nano-particles' is produced with a simple fermentation process is bizarre.

I'm only replying for others who want to learn. You deserve no reply.

Expand full comment

You think you have all the answers & all of your answers are correct. Step out of the hole you have dug for yourself, reset your mind to an open position and educate yourself. Your mind will love you for it! ☮️

Expand full comment

Imagine joining a substack in which you never discuss the evidence, but rather for some reason the priority is posting comments to divert from the evidence.

Expand full comment

With regard to the rectangular objects, what do you think about the way they seem to respond to EMF - do natural crystals do that?

https://rumble.com/v29mjpw-matt-taylor-formation-and-regression-of-rectangular-structure-in-response-t.html

Expand full comment

Yes, natural crystals do that. I looked at the video, and that's clearly natural crystallization occurring.

Natural crystallization requires subtle electromagnetic current, which would naturally be provided by the Earth's electromagnetic field, which can be detected by the simple compass.

So if a mineral in solution is put into a Faraday cage, which blocks magnetic fields, it can't crystallize. If it crystallizes when it's taken out, then remember it's now exposed to the Earth's EMF in addition to any man-made EMFs, so it would require experiments to separate the various sources of EMFs to see what effect each has on the sample.

The specific minerals involved will determine the geometric shape of the crystals. Some of the photos I've seen that people are calling 'antennas' are just salt crystals from the saline in the vax.

The guys in the video are absolutely clueless about both crystallization of minerals and electronics technology. It's kinda scary how people are so prone to create a fantasy because they don't understand what they're looking at. This is why humanity is in such a jam.

And thanks for asking. I really hope, if nothing else, people will consider those last two questions in my post.

Expand full comment

The electronic"printcards" if not to say the more elaborate "motherboards" that can be seen in the vax samples, is NOT natural crystallization of any kind!

The difference is that these "motherboards" have a composition of different geometrical forms joined together in a VERY STRICT pattern and TOTALLY missing the element of chaos that you will find in all natural occuring crystallizations.

The geometrical organisation of natural versions clearly miss this SUPER PRECISE ORGANISATION.

Expand full comment

Thanks, do you have any evidence that natural crystals can regress into a blob in the absence of EMF and then reform when EMF is present again. That is to say, has this been shown experimentally, whether in the literature or otherwise?

Expand full comment

Yes, this video explains in simple terms how crystal formation starts, and how the crystal becomes stable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LtcagskfJ8

The primary driver of the crystallization on microscope slides is evaporation of the water, which increases the concentration of minerals. If there was a way to prevent evaporation, it's likely there would be no crystallization.

The video doesn't mention the Earth's EMF as a factor, but that's a more complex aspect and the teacher is keeping it simple.

When the crystal is starting to grow and very tiny, the molecular bonds are very unstable, and will dissolve readily if the solution is diluted or the EMF stopped. It needs to grow to a certain size before it becomes nucleated, meaning the molecular bonds are stable and it won't dissolve so easily. To become nucleated it would be big enough to see and pick up with your fingers. Those microscopic crystals on the vax slides aren't even close to nucleated; very unstable and easily dissolved.

Expand full comment

Thanks I will check that out later. One thing I don't yet understand at all is why the medium is moving, and sometimes rapidly, even weeks after the sample has been prepared, and even with no cover slip. (https://drdavidnixon.com/1/en/topic/revised-de-construction-video) If it's water based why doesn't it evaporate? Why is the fluid moving at all? Then why does it apparently suddenly accelerate around 00:19:00 on the clock and then swirl back and forth?

Also, if you have a moment have a look at the segment from around 07:33:00 and especially 07:44:38 to 07:44:48.

Expand full comment

I don't know why the fluid is moving either, but I'll bet the vax hasn't altered the known laws of physics, so some outside force is acting on the sample. It would be up to the researcher to figure out why, and it's amateur to not address that.

I haven't seen any other reports of the vax not drying out on a slide, so something is weird. Is the guy adding water to keep the sample hydrated? That would explain the movement and the cyclical grow-dissolve-grow.

Without a detailed and complete description of the lab procedures, the results really aren't useful.

Also, I'll bet that if someone looked at other, older vaxes, they'd find similarly-strange things. I remember reading an Italian study several years ago where they found all sorts of toxic metals, bacteria & parasites, even microscopic glass shards in one vax.

Bottom line for me is that a vax on a slide growing microscopic mineral crystals would be expected, and at the least, easily understood.

Expand full comment

I found a very cool little video showing some different minerals crystallizing in a lab setting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo0cp2uhxb0

Expand full comment

Thanks a lot, yes I found that one when I was looking for video of natural salt crystallisation to compare. Some things are the same, but the behaviour of the vials has some features which I haven't found yet in natural crystals.

Expand full comment

Yep, but those examples in the crystal video are likely a single mineral in solution, so each one grows a simple, pure, predictable crystalline structure. The vax is many different minerals, some plentiful, some in trace amounts, and probably graphene too, so it's a very complex crystal-growing experiment that probably has never been seen before. Probably even different lots of the vax would have differences in crystal growth depending upon the precise mix of minerals.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree that the behaviour will be different, but normally if you add lots of different things into the mix, without conscious design, you get a bit of a mess rather than some new distinctive behaviour.

Can you tell me please what the LNPs are in, in the Cominarty concentrate (before dilution with saline)? Water, or something else, or just rolling around in the air as it were? I found this: 'A typical formulation process for mRNA LNPs starts with rapid mixing of an aqueous solution of mRNA and an alcohol solution of lipids' (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33157-4) Can't see anything in the Cominarty ingredients, but possibly water is taken for granted?

Expand full comment

What, in your opinion, is causing this disturbing trend?

https://makismd.substack.com/p/testicular-turbo-cancer-in-young

Expand full comment

Viruses are not the only topic on which people globally have bought into fiction and pseudo-science. Far from it. Cancer is a similar topic. What people believe about it is pure fiction, and not supported by science, and like with viruses that pervasive ignorance is exploited to keep people fearful, weak, and dependent. Cancer is actually a far bigger tragedy than viruses. People are afraid of viruses and willingly take poison thinking that will save them, and people are afraid of cancer even more, and take much stronger poisons thinking that will save them. The fatality rate and the total number of deaths from cancer treatment (poisoning) is far higher. And behind it is the same people, the Rockefeller medicine establishment, selling euthanasia and making it the most profitable product the world has ever seen.

Same as nobody dies from a 'virus', nobody dies from cancer. People die from cancer treatment, and other complications due to intense fear and complete irrationality.

So the narrative that some toxin is causing cells in a certain organ to suddenly morph into Franken-cells and start attacking the body is pure fiction, with no scientific basis.

Cancer is actually an emergency adaptation process, where the specific tissue involved needs to change or augment rapidly, as an intelligent biological survival response. Because people don't understand it, they panic and make up a story.

Testicular cancer is an augmentation of the testes, typically on one side, as a biological response to the shock from loss of a child. The augmentation, or 'tumor', is functional, meaning it's increasing the capacity of the testes for better chances of mating success. Once the male successfully mates and has another child on the way, the tumor will dissolve, and the testes will return to normal.

So the testicular cancer is not caused by the vaccine directly, but I'll bet there's an indirect link. We know the vaccine has been devastating on women's fertility, and many women are losing pregnancies, and infant deaths are up significantly. If we were able to find out the personal story from each of these cases of testicular cancer, we'd find that their wife had probably lost a pregnancy, or they'd lost a child, right before the 'cancer' appeared.

And cancer does not spread or 'metastasize'; that's more fiction. All cancers are the same intelligent survival response that I generally described above.

Because all cancers are a survival response, they are never the cause of death.

It takes years of study to fully understand the above; I can't possibly explain it suitably here.

Expand full comment

Humans are not the only victims...ALL LIFE; animals, plants, trees, fish...All LIFE HAS BEEN TARGETED FOR INFECTION by the Globalist Psycho-Predator Death Cult. It's an attack upon the whole EARTH. How is THAT to be designated/classified?

Expand full comment

I think so too. Their lifestyles has so far distanced themselves from the biology of this planet that they desire to kill it all off before it kills them.

Expand full comment

Correct

Expand full comment

It is true, but we have to understand that any study carried out since 2020 on this pandemic has no scientific validity. They are paid studies, financed by them to hide the truth of this genocide. That's why they talk about non-existent viruses, non-existent proteins and non-existent mRNAs.

They also financed the False Dissidence to collaborate with this cover-up.

Expand full comment

How do those who created the injections avoid it , if shedding is prevalent

Expand full comment

https://tinyurl.com/mcf4vfee

Expand full comment
Mar 16, 2023·edited Mar 16, 2023

Dr Ariyana Love says: "Using colloidal gold is only going to activate the nanotech" to which she added; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21809874/

So what do we make of that ^?

So there must be something else. But what? Is shedding truly there? How sure are we? What about PCR, IVM and all that toxic shit? (thinking now about the anti-IVM/VAX community warning the shit out of everyone about toxic IVM that might even or likely be in the vials as well according to them). Have we checked the blood samples of those who did not get a PCR nor IVM? Nope, not yet or that we are aware of at-the-least ..

----------

From a post on dr Love's chat;

Does collodial silver do the same?

"Yes... it does... it is used for growing the wires."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34063211/

"There was an aggressive promotion on COLLOIDAL GOLD AND SILVER that started 18 years ago... this assured that gullible people will have enough conductive materials in the body to have their first early adopters of the internet of bodies... people who ingest stuff without any scientific study or any clear indication of the benefits of what they are doing. I know a borg who still studies all I post, takes nano-silver and nano-gold that he makes since 20 years... but will not quit them even after the revelations saying that if he had no health condition in 20 years it is not a hazard... this is serious people..."

"How do you explain the health benefits of Col gold around the world. The Indians drank golden water and lived a healthy live."

"It's not about health... never was... only about control at the CELLULAR level (https://t.me/drloveschat/103093)... at this point I suspect even Tesla might have been implanted..."

Expand full comment

Dr Love may be correct. I think Dr Anna has had misgivings also. However there is one big thing to consider in the gold question; the gold does not have to be ingested in order to be effective. Gold proximity to the devices, without contact, accomplishes the same thing, according to Dr Nixon's observations. They dissolve and disappear. Ingestion was not necessary in that observation. This is why it is important to watch the entire video.

This tends to indicate that the dissolution effect of nanodevices is perhaps tied to an inherent frequency characteristic of gold. This was postulated by Dr David Nixon.

I think that Dr Anna conducting live blood analysis on patients would resolve the question of the effects of ingestion.

Expand full comment

Continue with the Supplementation of Zinc, Quercetin, NAC, Glycine, Nattokinase, Vit. D3/ K2. Don't stop. Find your healthy whole food sources...Farmers, Garden with Heirloom Seeds or buy from Farmers willing to grow with heirloom seeds.

Learn how to barter and use only cash to purchase anything.

DO NOT BUY PREPARED FOODS.

Sleep well.

We're being ATTACKED psychologically and being manipulated into helplessness/hopelessness which is DEPRESSION to remove all DESIRE TO FIGHT BACK. We're also being led by 'Evil-Controlled Resistance' DRIVING US TO TRUST THE CONSTITUTION EVIL HAS NEGATED while having an acting Govt. INSTALLED BY THE SAME EVIL.

The best course of action is to trust nobody, stay healthy and stay alert.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

How we understand the nuts and bolts (or nanoparticles and hydrogel) of the mechanism of genocide doesn't change the fact that we're in a genocide. But thank you, for this. It's very helpful.

They want layers of confusion and false narratives polluting the water, so people throw their hands up and walk away feeling there is no way to get to the bottom of it.

Layers and layers of lies. We don't really need to know (at least I don't) all the details to see the larger arch of the story.

Expand full comment

the 'damage' done by the 'spike' is shown, purportedly- by the staining of antibodies which have no proven specificity to the 'spike' ... as to the rest of this presentation- I have no comment...

Expand full comment

I've been struggling to answer this question since your Maria Zeee and Karen Kingston interview; the question was, is the spike protein and the hydrogel nanodots the same thing. This definitively answers that question. Thank you Dr Anna.

What this means is that anything that wipes out or dissolves the "spike protein" is in fact doing this to the quantum nanogels.

Expand full comment

This is about destroying God’s creation. https://rumble.com/v24t2b6-the-hybrid-age.html

Expand full comment

HOW is it then possible that autopsies conducted on several of the jab victims, who died "suddenly and unexpectedly," documented "vaccine"-induced spike protein and acute cellular inflammation in multiple organs, but in particular in the heart and brain of the victims?

Expand full comment

As I understand it, the autopsies showed damage done to tissues, not what caused the damage . Of course they assumed it was the spike protein, but the antibodies they found could have been reacting to any number of the toxins in the injections. I don't think they actually went on to isolate and identify the allegedly manufactured protein. They could do this if they wanted but they haven't apparently. And the western blot technique can be manipulated and doesn't necessarily prove presence of manufactured spike protein either. If they had found evidence of spike protein, they would have sequenced it and we would know for sure.

Expand full comment

They did isolate the protein that the immune response was reacting to and were thus able to determine definitively that the acute inflammation was caused by the actual manufactured spike protein introduced via the "vaccine" rather than from a natural infection. This is what made the findings from both German pathologists so important. They were not able to detect any viral proteins in the examined tissues, only the spike protein itself. That clearly implies that it was the "vaccine" rather than a natural infection that led to the deaths of these unfortunate individuals.

A study recently published by an Israeli team also found myocarditis and pericarditis in the vaccinated, but not in unvaccinated individuals:

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219

Expand full comment

My understanding is that the spike protein was NOT isolated directly from the blood, but simply ASSUMED to exist if certain antibodies (IgG and IgM I think) are present. In order to prove presence of spike protein specifically you would need to expose isolated antibodies to the other toxins found in the injections, not exclusively to the alleged mRNA-induced spike protein. If they also react to the other toxins, then they are not pathogen-specific so the existence of spike proteins cannot be assumed. I rewatched Dr Burkhardt's March 2022 presentation. He said they reacted positively to the mRNA spike protein but negatively to the nucleocapsid which is important as it demonstrates it's the injections that are harming people, not the virus. I skimmed through your link. Looks like they're saying the same. But neither the German pathology team nor authors of Israeli paper say they isolated the spike protein.

Expand full comment

The spike protein exterior of the nanogel is camouflage which double as a cell membrane breach by leveraging cellular receptors. The core of the nanogel is the real threat. Isolation of "the virus" would uncover the knowledge that this entire structure is synthetic and that therefore it had no natural origin. The general picture is covered here in technical detail by patent analysis and dissection of that patent analysis by Dr Ana Michalcea:

https://tinyurl.com/y4azkdju

Expand full comment

The Methods and Materials section of the Mörz report details the procedures used to identify the spike protein in one of the patients:

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651

Expand full comment
Mar 17, 2023·edited Mar 17, 2023

OK, so "cultured cells that had been transfected in vitro ... served as a positive control for the detection of vaccine-induced spike protein expression ..."; then we are told how they were cultured (which some might consider problematic in itself) but I am not seeing any follow-up control experiment to show these are specific to spike protein i.e. not shared by other molecules. Don't get me wrong: I am very happy Prof. Burkhardt's team found no trace of the virus in this patient and the others (even though many would say that was a foregone conclusion as there is no virus in the first place). Also immunohistochemistry/staining techniques/interpretation of results is tricky, often inaccurate and can only provide INDIRECT evidence for the presence of whatever they're looking for in the tissue or cell examined under microscope. That is why Prof. Burkhardt's slides refer to (assumed) "EXPRESSION of spike protein". Come to think of it, it seems like a lot of mucking around to find what they're looking for. I'm afraid I can't spend any more time on this and in any case I don't have the expertise to come to a conclusion. Maybe Dr Mihalcea does but she has said she has little time to address questions in comments section so maybe someone else here can clarify.

Expand full comment

Sasha Latypova just released this additional information this morning. You might find this interesting as well:

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide

Expand full comment

Thanks. I'll take a look.

Expand full comment

I wonder if a modulated EMF device ( Such as was invented by Royal Rife) could be utilized to somehow eliminate or disrupt Qdot technologies 🧐

Expand full comment

For any size manifestation of physical matter, there is a set of destructive harmonic frequencies.

https://tinyurl.com/5b6kd4pe

Expand full comment

The same type of people that put the kabash on Rife technologies back in the day, are in charge of guiding our medical procedures today - and they have ZERO interest in the matter, which means that we will have to take matters into our own hands. I’m sure they would Mount some sort of legal attack to prevent Rife treatments, but I think that it is worth looking into

Expand full comment

The man I mention above has competition, they're making a tone of money as they targeted a really great market and have the beginnings of the medicolegal requirements to bring it to human experimentation.

It's coming soon.

I think I know what to write on my sub stack now.

This technology will rock the world man.

The Rife Machines made today, don't work like the original, I don't think, as not too many people understand how it works.

It's like mixing modern technology with ancient forgotten technology.

Expand full comment

That's already been done I believe.

Expand full comment

Your link takes me to Aretha Franklin?!?

Expand full comment

I think his point for the Aretha vid is to show that at specific sonic frequencies glass will break - this same concept is the basis for Royal Rife’s ( that his actual name) “Rife machine” which was allegedly used to cause microscopic pathogens to be destroyed when their unique resonant frequency was determined and you zapped them. Interesting stuff

Expand full comment

It's Ella Fitzgerald. They don't look the same.

Expand full comment

Sacred geometry with 4D frequency modulation, the man who invented it is too scared and angry at the world to patent it, the Egyptian man who wrote the Algorithm must of sold it to the Chinese. Though they don't know how to put it together.

It's great technology. I know how to make it now. Just saying...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

C60 is a carbon lattice structure forming a sphere, called a buckyball. It's existence was theoretical for some time until it was discovered in nature. The first product use of it was for researchers who were being exposed to radiation in the course of investigations. It is a hugely beneficial molecule that tends to trap and allow excretion of molecular and pathogenic threats smaller than it is, and perhaps larger also, not positive about the latter, but I suspect it to be so. It has a wide range of beneficial effects that are beyond the scope of a thread response, if you can afford the cost of it.

Expand full comment
deletedMar 18, 2023·edited Mar 19, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mar 19, 2023·edited Mar 19, 2023

No, C60 is not an oxide, it's a pure carbon molecule in the shape of a sphere; 60 atoms of carbon's worth. That's why it's termed C 60. Graphene oxide on the other hand is a molecule of carbon and oxygen in a two dimensional lattice structure. The personality of any molecule is determined by the characteristics of it's atoms (on the periodic chart) in combination with each other AND how each periodic element's atomic electron orbits interact with their neighboring atoms. Molecular configuration between different atoms completely alters the electron orbits around the nucleus. So carbon and oxygen atoms joined together are going to have a completely separate and unique personality as compared to a molecule constituted of pure carbon.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

How then did they discover that the vaccine mRNA retranscribed to DNA in the liver in vitro?

Expand full comment

The darpa nanogel is designed to interface with cellular receptors, enter the cell and effect changes according to it's internal programming. This necessitates that the nanogel be able to enter the cell, for which there are existing mechanisms to block. If the body cells in question have no such barriers, then the cells become victim to the process. The intrusive dna code itself has been baked into the information within the nanogel (which again is detected as the spike protein, making you think it is just a spike protein, when in fact it is an actual synthetic threat). All this is covered in the patent documentation that Karen Kingston and Dr David Martin have covered at length in multiple interviews. The patent documentation was filed years in advance of the appearance of the so called spike protein.

Expand full comment

I detoxed some really sketchy looking "particles" that I can only describe as some kind of nanotech, manmade parasite of sorts. I have pictures. I can only assume that I got them from a chemtrail or from taking a fake covid test (before I knew about hydrogels early on). I am not vaxxed for c-19 but have had other vax before I was awake. I'd love to show this to Dr Ana and get her thoughts. It would be interesting to hear her thoughts on how we detox hydrogels etc out of our bodies. I was taking TRS - Zeolite- which is a heavy metal detox supplement when I detoxed a clump of these out of my face. They looks like little pieces of fiberglass. I also detoxed a morgellon out of my back that I swear felt like it was alive and magnetic. It literally jumped out of my finger when I pulled it out. Imagine how much of these substances we have in our bodies without knowing that bioaccumulate and are conductive via frequency. Scary!

Expand full comment

This is definitely disturbing. Pictures would be good if you could get them into a webspace

Expand full comment

Good idea. I have a lifestyle blog I could post photos to. In the meantime if you want to see pictures feel free to email me robyn@grillgirl.com and I'll share. Cheers - Robyn

Expand full comment

Dr Ana,

I wrote this just now at Steve Kirsch's substack:

But you did say he found the lipid nanoparticles, which is significant, as follows

"Dr David Martin Explains Covid Vaccines are not Vaccines but are Medical Devices" - (duration = 9:16)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/btlfoUxnXerh/

According to Judy Mikovits in the above video at time = 6:52, "...among many things. It can actually directly cause, um, multiple sclerosis, Lou Gehrig's disease, Alzheimer's disease, because that's what the expression of that pathogenic envelope, it can cause accelerated cancer, that's what the expression of that piece of virus, that syncytin alone, has been known to do for decades. You injected the disease, literally."

Expand full comment

I have been investigating bottled and unbottled (tap, rain) water under an optical microscope for some time and have found structures very similar to those seen in vaccines, although at a much lower concentration. Although I have not performed Micro Raman analysis, they look very similar to those containing graphene oxide. I have also investigated the images that appeared during physiological serum desiccation at different time phases; I can say that these images are identical to many of those published as microchips in Covid vaccines. I cannot say that there are not. But if it were true, microchips would also be found in dried saline solution.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing what you found. It's not good but I would rather know.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your reply. Here you can find more information about these investigations, greetings.

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/qyIifnaRseVH/

Expand full comment

HOW TO STOP ALL TREASON!

Because we are in trouble with the HORROR theatre on ALL fronts we are witnessing daily…

My message to every American will be this EVERY day until more Americans get it…QUITTERS NEVER WIN!

ART OF WAR…to win, restoring Freedom and the Constitutional principles!

1. Quit focusing and whining about today and yesterday…WHY? Enemies of Freedom have their next 100 battle plans ready to go against you!

2. Focus on this FACT everyday until you get it…You cannot stop any of the evil/Treason unless you plan to stop it ALL!

3. UNITE in 1 place receiving the SAME message from strategic planning experts.

Where and how? See end of this post about Gideon’s Army…

4. Civic Duty 101…Prepare to sacrifice, yes SACRIFICE your time, money and serious efforts using your talents and blessings God gave you to save your Republic!

5. Pray a lot AND participate in things (actions) that matter for Freedom!

Respectfully,

A very fierce Mother Lion/Grandmother (of 6 and counting)

P.S. Are you looking for Gideon’s Army of 300 men yet…who pray and strategically plan to execute actions that matter and already have wins?

Keep an eye on Lex Greene @ news with views.com…serious background!

If you are ready to do something that matters…Lex Greene contact at end of this piece!

QUITTERS NEVER WIN by Lex Green @newswithviews.com

Expand full comment

We have to lead & maybe some of these butter cups Americans will start to see the light! LOL

Expand full comment

Is that implying that Trump is the answer?

Expand full comment

there's chips in it and it comes up on your cell phone for tracing you ,may big pharma be accountable at Nuremburg 2.0

there is no covid19 but 5g that's causing flu like symptom's that's being used to push the bio weapons' and harm to kill we the people humans !

Expand full comment

Students study medicine in the universities and it takes years beyond a regular 4 year degree to obtain a medical degree. I used to totally believe that doctors were infallible...now I quetstion the material they learn in med school. If they were into prevention and healing they would not be studying sick people, vaccines, and medicine They would be studying healthy people and teaching their patients how to be healthy and stay healthy. The word doctor comes from the Latin word docere, which means to teach. Twenty-six hundred years ago Hippocrates taught doctors and his patients about natural healing. He knew more at that time than most doctors know today. He advocated the right foods and a healthy lifestyle; and used medicine as a last resort. Years ago I read up on the immune system and ilearned that the immune system had lymph glands through out the body, which produced white corpuscles. When foreign protein or matter of any kind entered the bloodstream the lymph glands start producing massive amounts of white corpuscles to attack - and clean out the bloodstream of anything that did not belong. This made me wonder how the vaccine manufacturers could have claimed their vaccines would provide GREATER IMMUNITY? I read they were going out of business in 1986 , because they were being hit with so many multi-million dollar lawsuits for their defective products. They let their "friends" in Congress know that they would be going out of business, unless they got help. Congress complied and pased

The NationalChildhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which gave vaccine manufacturerrs NO liabilty for injuries and deaths caused by their vaccines. If this had not occurred all this mish mash going on today would not be happening. Many are really questioning what doctors learn in med school? It sure isn't anything to do with prevention or better health. In the last sixty years, American children have gone downhill mentally and physically. Legal drugs as well as illegal drugs, have caused a plethora of psychologically-damaged people, too.

Expand full comment