25 Comments

IN THE END, We will ReMeMbeR

NOT THE WORDS of

OUR ENEMiES, BUT THE SILENCE OF OUR FRIENDS🫤

Expand full comment

You mentioned Kevin Mckernan and the SV40 promoter. He also found the plasmid DNA in the batches he tested. Do you think different batches had different materials? Some may have had the nano tech and others not?

Expand full comment

MIT CHARLES WYNN

New Technology Uses Lasers to Transmit Audible Messages to Specific People | Optica

Our system can be used from some distance away to beam information directly to someone's ear,” said research team leader Charles M. Wynn. https://www.optica.org/about/newsroom/news_releases/2019/new_technology_uses_lasers_to_transmit_audible_messages_to_specific_people/#:~:text=By%20sweeping%20the%20laser%20they,be%20localized%20to%20one%20person.&text=For%20the%20DPAS%2Drelated%20approach,audible%20pitches%2C%20in%20the%20light.

Expand full comment

MIT IEMELSON PRIZE WINNER

WOODY NORRIS!

HyperSonic Sound controls the direction of sound emitted, HSS is focused like laser beam. When aimed at listener it has the effect of wearing headphones, almost like voice inside one’s head.

https://lemelson.mit.edu/award-winners/elwood-woody-norris

https://patents.justia.com/inventor/elwood-g-norris

Expand full comment

WOODY NORRIS. MIT IEMELSON PRIZE WINNER FOUNDED LONG RANGE ACOUSTIC DEVICES. LRAD.

LRAD IS A MILITARY CONTRACTOR!

THESE ARE THE DEVICES USED ON TI S!

https://genasys.com/lrad-products/#handportable

Expand full comment

In the volumes of information here, on dental anesthetics, what label does the manufacturing?

Who produces it, and where?

Expand full comment

60 minutes piece on JOSEPH MENGELE.

NAZI S TOP TORTURER!

https://x.com/60Minutes/status/1792344168661954994?s=19

Expand full comment

Does EBOO include the hemealumin light INSIDE the blood? Because you said that would be bad!

Expand full comment

SEPTEMBER 7TH 2024. LASER LIGHT ON CAR WINDSHIELD.

VIDEO RECORDED WITH CELL SAMSUNG A14!

IN PLEASANT HILL CALIFORNIA

OAK PARK BLVD BY PATTERSON!

https://x.com/RobertoSun6/status/1832631396420219250?s=19

Expand full comment

4 mins ago. (Shared post I first wrote on Karen Kingston's Substack)

Dr. Ana, Why aren't more "true and reliable journalists" not reporting on this subject and also, more alarmingly, the nanobots in the vaccines (and elsewhere)? I've been waiting ever since I started reading about these things a few months ago. You and Karen Kingstone and a few others I'm aware of have mentioned them ; you and Karen extensively (THANK YOU!). Is it fear that keeps it out of the headlines? I admit that it could produce panic but probably more likely just more denial. But also it might be the final straw that makes people WAKE UP!!! What do you think????

Expand full comment

Mainstream media is owned over 70% by pharma. What they don't want you to know is censored.

Expand full comment
Sep 6·edited Sep 6

Great interview! I never tire listening to you, dear Dr. Ana. Your dedication transcends the terrible reality that you speak of in detail. Bless you for the top quality investigative work that you keep on doing day after day on top of your no doubt very demanding medical practice.

Expand full comment

BS vendors for the gullible. Caveat emptor.

Expand full comment

Care to explain that?

Expand full comment

I am calling these people liars, and I am accusing them of misleading the public.

Expand full comment

So 3 foot long rubbery clots found by embalmers are misleading people?

Ever watch "Died Suddenly" on rumble/bitchute?

Expand full comment

Presenting such anomalies as red herrings, is misleading because the intention is to induce the public into making hasty generalizations.

These are distractions from science, and amplify misinformation. Misleading the public to make them question well established science is fraud.

Furthermore it is the marketing funnel for those who present pseudoscience as an alternative, preying on those vulnerable to fear and misinformation.

By exploiting cognitive biases, they are capitalizing on emotional responses, rather than logical reason, benefiting vendors of dubious products, while undermining public health.

Lying by omission includes, ignoring positive data, neglecting contextual information, dismissing the broader consensus, and concealing benefits.

These are BS vendors. Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.

No offense, but I'm not wasting anymore time on these red herrings. While BS vendors must be called out, and the public alerted, there are more important things to learn. These people have a political axe to grind, and it is important that the public is not subjected to the downstream negative consequences of their BS vending operations. They are undermining the social order in our society. I cannot allow that to go unrebutted, and I am sure most people would agree with me.

Expand full comment

So you trust the science. Fauci, Birx, Collins ARE the science, right?

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." Marcia Angell

Can you answer y two questions?

Expand full comment

I you don't do your homework, and take the lazy man's way out with facile generalizations, you won't get the results you actually expect.

Expand full comment
RemovedSep 6
Comment removed
Expand full comment

What reason for removal?

We all supposed to share knowledges to keep people informed and to help each other !

Expand full comment

SPAM^

Expand full comment